Clay Phillips

Supply chains are more volatile and interconnected than ever, but many planning processes still rely on disconnected systems, manual analysis, and spreadsheet-based interventions. This white paper explores how network optimization, supported by advances in optimization technology, workflow design, cloud computing, and AI, can help planning teams evaluate cross-functional trade-offs, respond faster to change, and move from static plans to continuous, decision-driven supply chain planning. Inside the White Paper: – Why traditional planning systems and network optimization evolved separately, and why that separation limits decision quality in today’s supply chains. – How network optimization helps evaluate cross-functional trade-offs across sourcing, production, inventory, transportation, fulfillment, service, cost, and capacity. – Why continuous network optimization is different from one-time strategic modeling, and how it can support recurring tactical and operational planning decisions. – How AI and configurable workflows can make optimization more usable for planners without requiring them to become modeling experts. – How planning systems and network optimization can work together in a feedback loop that improves decisions over time. Click here to download

written by Deborah Dull, on site at GreenBiz 2026   It started over drinks, 80s music, and a shared frustration that has probably launched more good organizations than any strategic planning process ever has. The Circular Supply Chain Coalition, or CSCC, came out of a realization that a lot of the right work was already happening, in reverse logistics, in remanufacturing, in local procurement, in community-based value chains, but nobody had connected it. The people doing the work were not in the same room. The companies with the materials were not talking to the processors who could recover them. The states with enabling policies were not linked to the investors looking for exactly those environments. So the coalition became, as its founders describe it, a collector of collectors. The focus right now is on three priority waste streams: batteries, semiconductors, and e-waste. These were not chosen randomly. They have two elements in common. They carry geopolitical consequence, meaning the supply chains behind them are controlled by other countries and that is a known vulnerability. And they have business cases that a CFO can actually evaluate. That second part matters more than people in the sustainability world usually admit. The hub…