Share:

The 3 Critical Questions Enterprise Shippers Ask Me About AI

Special Guest Blog Post written by Matt McKinney, Co-Founder and CEO of Loop

 

I spend most of my time with supply chain and innovation leaders at major enterprises who are sitting on significant AI budgets but struggling to show measurable business impact in an increasingly complex and volatile supply chain environment.

 

These conversations have evolved dramatically. A year ago, executives were asking basic questions about AI feasibility. Today, the questions have shifted to strategic implementation at enterprise scale.

 

Based on hundreds of these discussions, three questions consistently emerge that separate companies making transformational progress from those stuck in pilot purgatory.

 

  1. How do we move from AI experiments to enterprise-scale impact?

 

Most organizations have yet to see organization-wide, bottom-line impact from AI use. This is the strategic challenge keeping C-suite leaders awake at night.

 

The problem isn’t the technology. It’s the application of the technology. Too many enterprises are trying to treat AI like a magic wand they can bolt onto existing systems. But garbage in, garbage out. If your underlying data is fragmented and inconsistent, AI won’t solve your problems; in fact they’ll get worse.

 

At its core, anything automated is powered by data. You have to start with AI solutions that solve the core data problems first. This means finding design partners that specialize in data centralization, especially for messy and unstructured data pulled from any source (systems, emails, PDFs, CSVs, feeds, etc.)

 

The key distinction is between AI that requires clean data as input versus AI that can make sense of unstructured information without requiring you to clean it first. The latter is what enables enterprise-scale impact because it solves your existing data mess rather than perpetuating it.

 

Once you establish that data foundation, you unlock process automation and create opportunities to solve use cases that sit on top of that data.

 

  1. What’s the fastest path to measurable ROI while building toward bigger ambitions?

 

Start where the worst data problems exist in your organization. Where are teams unable to scale effectively? Where’s the lack of repeatability and endless manual work?

 

Transportation data is a perfect example. You’re dealing with third-party data from carriers, pulling information from multiple platforms, documents, feeds, and emails to create a single source of truth. Because transportation isn’t purchase order-based, you also face cost allocation challenges on top of data complexity. 

 

This core data problem principle applies everywhere: legal teams drowning in contract reviews, procurement teams manually processing vendor agreements, finance teams struggling with cost allocations across business units. Solving the ugliest, most manual processes in your organization first makes everything else exponentially easier.

 

Once you prove success in one area, that same reasoning engine can be applied to adjacent use cases. The technology that learns to understand transportation contracts can analyze procurement agreements, legal documents, and other unstructured data across your enterprise.

 

  1. How do we scale AI across our organization without losing control?

 

This is where governance becomes critical. Find design partners who understand enterprise complexity and can provide the framework for responsible AI deployment.

 

You need transparency, traceability, and tools that adapt to your business. Look for partners who can provide:

  • Explainability: Clear audit trails showing how decisions were made
  • Configurability: AI that can follow your business rules and exceptions
  • Oversight: Guardrails that ensure humans stay in the loop when needed

 

Start with one area as your AI center of excellence. The team that cracks that first deployment becomes your internal center of excellence. They’ll develop the standards, workflows, and trust needed to expand responsibly.

 

The companies that win with AI don’t treat it as a point solution. They build repeatable frameworks for identifying data problems, validating outcomes, and scaling across the business.

 

The window for AI-driven competitive advantage is narrow and closing fast. Start where the chaos is loudest. Prove it works. Then scale.

 

Matt McKinney is co-founder and CEO of Loop, the AI-native transportation spend management platform. Loop’s proprietary AI turns fragmented data into trusted, actionable intelligence, empowering teams to control costs, improve margins, and increase working capital.

More Blogs

procurement
Blogs
June 26, 2026

AI Is Good at Picking Qualified Suppliers. It Still Struggles to Pick the Best One.

Companies are rapidly integrating generative AI into procurement and sourcing decisions. The promise is obvious. AI can read thousands of pages of supplier proposals faster than any human team, summarize technical requirements in seconds, and create the appearance of consistency and objectivity in evaluation. But there is an important distinction managers are starting to overlook. The same AI system that performs extremely well at identifying whether a supplier meets minimum requirements may perform much less reliably when judging which supplier is truly better. Recent research published in the Journal of Business Logistics examined this issue by comparing how large language models evaluated supplier bids against evaluations completed by experienced procurement professionals. It analyzed 123 supplier proposals tied to 31 public procurement projects conducted by the State of Ohio between 2023 and 2024. The projects involved complex IT services contracts, many containing large, text-heavy bid packages requiring evaluative judgment rather than simple arithmetic comparisons. The researchers tested three reasoning-oriented AI models: OpenAI o3, Grok-3-Mini, and DeepSeek R1. They then compared their evaluations against human procurement scores. The findings revealed a surprisingly clear pattern. AI performed well when evaluating compliance signals. These are signals tied to baseline qualifications and technical requirements. Does…
execution
Blogs
May 1, 2026

Execution Over Everything: What It Takes to Win in Modern Supply Chains

At MODEX 2026 in Atlanta, Scott Luton sat down with Tevon Taylor, Senior Vice President of Contract Logistics at Pegasus Logistics Group, for a candid conversation about what’s really driving success (and failure) in today’s supply chains. From tariffs and AI to warehouse inefficiencies and leadership mindset, Taylor’s perspective cuts through the noise with a simple truth: technology matters, but execution matters more.   Disruption Is the New Normal If there’s one constant in 2026, it’s disruption. Tariffs, geopolitical uncertainty, and shifting trade lanes are no longer occasional challenges. They’re baked into the system. “You can’t stick to the old methods of running your supply chain. You must constantly find new ways to gain resilience,” Taylor explains. That resilience starts with flexibility. Companies that rely on rigid, linear networks are increasingly vulnerable. Instead, supply chain leaders must rethink how they design and operate their networks. Taylor emphasizes the need for multi-threaded strategies: nearshoring, domestic sourcing, and diversified transportation routes. In short, supply chains must evolve from static systems into adaptable ecosystems.   AI Is More of a Requirement Than a Buzzword While some technologies come and go as industry cliches or flavor of the month, Taylor is clear that artificial…