Share:

The 3 Critical Questions Enterprise Shippers Ask Me About AI

Special Guest Blog Post written by Matt McKinney, Co-Founder and CEO of Loop

 

I spend most of my time with supply chain and innovation leaders at major enterprises who are sitting on significant AI budgets but struggling to show measurable business impact in an increasingly complex and volatile supply chain environment.

 

These conversations have evolved dramatically. A year ago, executives were asking basic questions about AI feasibility. Today, the questions have shifted to strategic implementation at enterprise scale.

 

Based on hundreds of these discussions, three questions consistently emerge that separate companies making transformational progress from those stuck in pilot purgatory.

 

  1. How do we move from AI experiments to enterprise-scale impact?

 

Most organizations have yet to see organization-wide, bottom-line impact from AI use. This is the strategic challenge keeping C-suite leaders awake at night.

 

The problem isn’t the technology. It’s the application of the technology. Too many enterprises are trying to treat AI like a magic wand they can bolt onto existing systems. But garbage in, garbage out. If your underlying data is fragmented and inconsistent, AI won’t solve your problems; in fact they’ll get worse.

 

At its core, anything automated is powered by data. You have to start with AI solutions that solve the core data problems first. This means finding design partners that specialize in data centralization, especially for messy and unstructured data pulled from any source (systems, emails, PDFs, CSVs, feeds, etc.)

 

The key distinction is between AI that requires clean data as input versus AI that can make sense of unstructured information without requiring you to clean it first. The latter is what enables enterprise-scale impact because it solves your existing data mess rather than perpetuating it.

 

Once you establish that data foundation, you unlock process automation and create opportunities to solve use cases that sit on top of that data.

 

  1. What’s the fastest path to measurable ROI while building toward bigger ambitions?

 

Start where the worst data problems exist in your organization. Where are teams unable to scale effectively? Where’s the lack of repeatability and endless manual work?

 

Transportation data is a perfect example. You’re dealing with third-party data from carriers, pulling information from multiple platforms, documents, feeds, and emails to create a single source of truth. Because transportation isn’t purchase order-based, you also face cost allocation challenges on top of data complexity. 

 

This core data problem principle applies everywhere: legal teams drowning in contract reviews, procurement teams manually processing vendor agreements, finance teams struggling with cost allocations across business units. Solving the ugliest, most manual processes in your organization first makes everything else exponentially easier.

 

Once you prove success in one area, that same reasoning engine can be applied to adjacent use cases. The technology that learns to understand transportation contracts can analyze procurement agreements, legal documents, and other unstructured data across your enterprise.

 

  1. How do we scale AI across our organization without losing control?

 

This is where governance becomes critical. Find design partners who understand enterprise complexity and can provide the framework for responsible AI deployment.

 

You need transparency, traceability, and tools that adapt to your business. Look for partners who can provide:

  • Explainability: Clear audit trails showing how decisions were made
  • Configurability: AI that can follow your business rules and exceptions
  • Oversight: Guardrails that ensure humans stay in the loop when needed

 

Start with one area as your AI center of excellence. The team that cracks that first deployment becomes your internal center of excellence. They’ll develop the standards, workflows, and trust needed to expand responsibly.

 

The companies that win with AI don’t treat it as a point solution. They build repeatable frameworks for identifying data problems, validating outcomes, and scaling across the business.

 

The window for AI-driven competitive advantage is narrow and closing fast. Start where the chaos is loudest. Prove it works. Then scale.

 

Matt McKinney is co-founder and CEO of Loop, the AI-native transportation spend management platform. Loop’s proprietary AI turns fragmented data into trusted, actionable intelligence, empowering teams to control costs, improve margins, and increase working capital.

More Blogs

supply chain planning
Blogs
January 16, 2026

Demand Chain AI’s Rob Haddock on Raising Planning Maturity and Helping Companies Outgrow Spreadsheets

At the Gartner Supply Chain Planning Summit in Denver, Scott Luton caught up with Rob Haddock, a seasoned supply chain practitioner and advisor with Demand Chain AI, to discuss the persistent planning challenges organizations face—and why maturity, discipline, and optimization still matter more than buzzwords. Demand Chain AI blends consulting services with advanced supply chain technologies, focusing on optimization across trade promotion management, demand sensing, supply planning, and detailed production scheduling. Haddock’s role centers on helping organizations strengthen business processes—particularly sales and operations planning (S&OP), performance reporting, and the practical application of technology to improve execution on both the demand and supply sides.   A Practitioner’s Perspective on Planning Gaps Haddock’s perspective is shaped by decades spent inside large, sophisticated supply chain organizations. Early in his career, he worked within an iconic, global beverage company where advanced planning environments were already in place—though, in hindsight, he admits those tools were sometimes underutilized. Today, Haddock spends much of his time working with small and mid-sized organizations that haven’t been as fortunate. In many of these environments, planning maturity is still low, foundational practices are missing, and—unsurprisingly—Excel remains the primary planning tool. “Basic business practices that have been around since the 1990s…
reverse logistics
Blogs
January 28, 2026

Why Can’t America Train Workers for a Trillion-Dollar Industry?

Inside the reverse logistics education gap and the economic blind spot keeping it invisible Special Guest Blog Post written by Deborah Dull   Tony Sciarrotta has been asking the same question at industry conferences for years. As the Senior Director of Circularity and Reverse Logistics at the National Retail Federation, he knows what answer he’s going to get. But he keeps asking anyway. “Anybody in here go to school for returns management, reverse logistics, circularity? Any degrees in those fields the room?” It’s rare that anyone raises their hand. “That’s what’s wrong with our industry,” Sciarrotta told me at NRF Rev this January, the first conference under NRF’s new reverse logistics banner. “We still need to fix it.”   The Numbers That Should Make Headlines Here’s what makes reverse logistics so fascinating: the scale is staggering, but the infrastructure to support it needs to be stronger. According to the National Retail Federation, American retailers processed approximately $890 billion in returns in 2024 which is roughly 17% of all retail sales – and it’s higher for ecommerce. But that number almost certainly understates reality. “We have a fragmented industry,” Sciarrotta explained. “Where are all those returns going? It has to be…