Share:

5 questions I frequently get asked about automating operations with AI

Special Guest Blog Post written by Parabola Founder & CEO, Alex Yaseen 

 

Operators are under pressure.

They’re expected to move faster, do more with less, and somehow keep everything running smoothly while their systems, tools, and data are a mess.

Now, AI is adding a whole new layer. On one hand, it’s exciting. The potential is real. On the other, a lot of teams feel stuck. They know they should be using AI, but they’re not sure where it fits into their day-to-day work.

These are the five questions I get asked most often—whether someone’s trying to get started with automation, or trying to figure out how AI actually helps.

1. Can we automate this, or is it too messy?

This question usually comes from someone deep in a spreadsheet that was never meant to scale.

The short answer is: yes, you can probably automate it. But the longer answer is that you’ll need to rethink the process first. AI can help summarize, transform, and clean data—but it won’t fix a broken workflow. That’s on you.

The best teams pair structured automation with lightweight AI to get leverage. Think: using rules and logic to standardize a workflow, and AI to handle exceptions or unstructured inputs.

2. Do we need engineering or a data team to do this?

AI makes a lot of things more accessible. But most teams still assume they need technical support just to get started.

The shift I’ve seen recently is that more ops teams are starting to build for themselves. With the right tools, they don’t have to wait for an engineer to map an API or a data analyst to clean a CSV. That speed matters. Especially when the business is changing weekly and you need your tools to keep up.

3. Where’s the best place to start?

I get this one a lot. The pressure to do something with AI can be paralyzing.

My advice is: don’t overthink it. Start with something you already do often. Maybe it’s a weekly report, a monthly reconciliation, or pulling together data from five different systems. Add automation to make it faster. Layer in AI to make it smarter—maybe to interpret an email or summarize rows of free-text data. You’ll get a feel for what’s possible, and you’ll quickly see where the value is.

4. How do we avoid creating a black box?

There’s a real fear that AI-powered workflows become black boxes: hard to audit, impossible to explain, and fragile when things break.

That’s why visibility matters. Automations should be transparent and traceable. You should always understand how decisions are made, and why an output changed. That’s also why I’m a fan of keeping AI in the loop, not giving it full control. Let it assist, not own.

One way to do that is to treat your workflows like a living SOP. Every automated process should serve as a clear, evolving record of how things work, just like a great SOP would. The difference is, now it’s executable. If the process changes, the workflow updates with it. You’re not just documenting how your business runs. You’re encoding it in real time.

5. How do we scale this across the team?

Once a team gets one automation working, they usually want to do more. But it’s easy for things to get messy again—especially if AI tools aren’t consistent or shareable.

The best approach I’ve seen is to treat your automations like internal products. Make sure they’re documented. Make sure they’re understandable. And make sure they’re flexible enough to evolve. AI doesn’t replace that discipline—it makes it more important.

Why this matters

I’ve been lucky to learn from some of the most forward-thinking operators in the industry. Their questions have shaped how we think about building tools that are simple, flexible, and powerful enough to keep up with the complexity of modern supply chains.

At Parabola, we’ve seen firsthand how ops teams can move faster when they combine structured automation with the right AI in the right places. If this is something you’re thinking about, I’m always happy to connect and trade notes.

And big thanks to Supply Chain Now for continuing to push the conversation forward. Their insights are a constant source of clarity and education in a space that’s evolving fast.

 

Alex Yaseen is the founder and CEO of Parabola. After working closely with the in-the-weeds people powering some of the largest retail and CPG brands, he started Parabola to empower the ops and finance teams closest to the messy work to be the ones who automate it.

More Blogs

digital supply chain
Blogs
February 27, 2026

Five Key Supply Chain Trends for 2026: Navigating the Road to Transformation

This post is written by our friends at e2open. E2open is the connected supply chain software platform that enables the world’s largest companies to transform the way they make, move, and sell goods and services. Moving as one.™ Learn More: www.e2open.com.   Supply chains are entering a pivotal stretch of highway into the future. It’s a route marked by regulatory detours, geopolitical potholes, and rising expectations for speed, intelligence, and resilience. The journey ahead demands connected data, embedded AI, and agile decision-making. Below are the five major “mile markers” defining the road to supply chain transformation, and how e2open helps organizations navigate the way forward with confidence.   1. Tariff and non‑tariff compliance risks: avoiding costly road hazards Tariff volatility and non‑tariff barriers create regulatory road conditions that can change quickly. For cost-focused leaders, this unpredictability can feel like driving through dense fog. One wrong move can result in delays, penalties, or unplanned expenses. Forward‑thinking organizations are installing automated guardrails: integrated trade compliance systems, dynamic landed‑cost modeling, and synchronized import/export workflows. These tools help reduce blind spots and ensure companies don’t veer into costly territory. The e2open Global Trade suite puts the world’s most comprehensive, continuously updated regulatory content directly…
reverse logistics
Blogs
January 28, 2026

Why Can’t America Train Workers for a Trillion-Dollar Industry?

Inside the reverse logistics education gap and the economic blind spot keeping it invisible Special Guest Blog Post written by Deborah Dull   Tony Sciarrotta has been asking the same question at industry conferences for years. As the Senior Director of Circularity and Reverse Logistics at the National Retail Federation, he knows what answer he’s going to get. But he keeps asking anyway. “Anybody in here go to school for returns management, reverse logistics, circularity? Any degrees in those fields the room?” It’s rare that anyone raises their hand. “That’s what’s wrong with our industry,” Sciarrotta told me at NRF Rev this January, the first conference under NRF’s new reverse logistics banner. “We still need to fix it.”   The Numbers That Should Make Headlines Here’s what makes reverse logistics so fascinating: the scale is staggering, but the infrastructure to support it needs to be stronger. According to the National Retail Federation, American retailers processed approximately $890 billion in returns in 2024 which is roughly 17% of all retail sales – and it’s higher for ecommerce. But that number almost certainly understates reality. “We have a fragmented industry,” Sciarrotta explained. “Where are all those returns going? It has to be…