Share:

The Geopolitics of Junk

written by Deborah Dull, on site at GreenBiz 2026

 

I spent today in a room full of people who think about waste for a living. And the word that kept coming up had nothing to do with recycling. It was sovereignty.

Here is the situation. The United States imports 95% of its critical mineral supply. Lithium, cobalt, rare earth elements, the stuff inside every battery, every semiconductor, every electric motor. We do not make it, we do not mine much of it, and we do not control the supply chain that delivers it. That is not an energy policy problem. That is a national security problem.

Now here is the part that should make you put down your coffee. A ton of smartphones contains dramatically more gold than a ton of mined ore. We are talking about concentrations that make urban mining look like a gold rush compared to digging in the ground. And yet the recovery rate for those materials, once a phone leaves its first owner, drops to around 13%. We are losing roughly 80% of the value sitting in devices right now, in drawers, in closets, in landfills.

E-waste is also the fastest growing waste stream in the world, at 2% per year. We are not catching up. We are falling further behind every single year we delay building the systems to recover these materials.

What I kept hearing today, from people running battery recycling operations, from state economic development officers, from supply chain professionals, is a reframe that matters. Urban mining is not a recycling program. It is a domestic supply chain strategy. The materials are already refined. They are already concentrated. They already exist inside products we made and sold. The only part missing is the infrastructure to get them back and the policy environment that makes it worth doing.

There are some promising signals. The federal government put $100 million toward critical mineral recovery through Project Vault. A critical mineral ministerial just launched. States like New Mexico are directing sovereign wealth fund capital toward exactly this kind of industry. The appetite is real.

But appetite without direction goes to the people who already have the relationships. That is not cynicism, that is just how procurement works. The question for everyone working in this space right now is whether we can get specific enough, fast enough, to shape where that money actually goes.

The materials are not buried in a mountain somewhere waiting on a 20-year permitting process. They are in your junk drawer. They are in the back of your office supply closet. They are in the decommissioned equipment sitting in a warehouse three miles from here.

We just need to stop treating them like trash and start treating them like inventory.

More Blogs

logistics
Blogs
July 10, 2025

Five Questions I Wished People Asked Me About Public Sector Supply Chains

Special Guest Blog Post written by Gary Smith, CPIM-F, CSCP-F, CLTD-F, Author of “The Bridge,” Supply Chain Engineer, and Educator   1. Do Supply Chains exist in the public sector? The short answer is “YES!” I spent the first 25 years of my career in the private sector where I worked in warehouse operations, industrial engineering, and consulting, all in the logistics andsupply chain area. I cut my teeth on retail, automotive, chemical, food and beverage, publishing, and manufacturing. During that time, I also completed projects for the public sector in education and for the Department of Defense. In 2005 I was named Director of Supply Chain Operations for the New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA). We operated a 200,000 sq. ft. warehouse that shipped repair material to 335 developments in New York’s five boroughs. In 2013, I was named Vice President of Supply Logistics for New York City Transit, the largest public transportation organization in North America. We operated over 1.5 million sq. ft. of warehouse space covering all of New York City. Several years ago, I was on a national committee for the Association for Supply Chain Management (ASCM). We created this elevator speech to describe Supply Chain…
multi-echelon inventory optimization
Blogs
July 2, 2026

Multi-Echelon Inventory Optimization Explained: How to Cut Inventory Without Cutting Service

When service levels slip, most organizations respond the same way: add more inventory. A little extra safety stock here, a buffer there, and to many businesses, that feels like the safest path forward. But it rarely works. Instead of solving the problem, businesses end up with bloated inventory in one location and stockouts in another. Working capital climbs, service is still inconsistent, and planners are stuck reacting rather than improving outcomes. It’s like trying to fix traffic by adding more cars to the road, and congestion just gets worse. This is the inventory trap: chasing service by piling up stock instead of managing it strategically.   What is Multi-Echelon Inventory Optimization? Multi-Echelon inventory optimization (MEIO) helps you put the right inventory in the right places across your network to hit service goals with less total stock. Instead of optimizing each site in isolation, MEIO looks at your entire network of plants, distribution centers, suppliers, and customers as one connected system.   The three most common inventory issues businesses face At its core, MEIO answers three questions every supply chain leader is asking: Where should we hold inventory? Not every location needs the same level of protection. MEIO determines the most…