Share:

Uncovering Hidden Costs in Supply Chain Planning: Tom Moore of ProvisionAI on What Companies Miss

In today’s increasingly complex global supply chain landscape, Tom Moore keeps his message refreshingly straightforward: ProvisionAI helps large companies discover hidden costs and eliminate them. Organizations such as Procter & Gamble, Nestlé, and Unilever have leveraged the company’s technology to uncover and eliminate inefficiencies—particularly in transportation and warehousing—that traditional systems fail to detect. The outcome is significant and often delivers immediate savings.

But Moore believes many of these problems stem from misunderstandings about the very technologies companies rely on.

 

Misnamed Systems & Misaligned Expectations

Before the interview officially began, Moore reflected on the surprisingly inaccurate names assigned to modern supply chain technologies. ERP systems rarely plan resources across the enterprise, despite what their name suggests. Warehouse Management Systems, while certainly used in warehouses, don’t actually “manage” much at all. People behind keyboards still make most of the critical decisions.

This disconnect in terminology shapes faulty expectations. Many organizations believe their planning systems will truly plan the supply chain, yet most tools merely react to demand signals. If ABC Company orders ten cases, the system automatically replenishes—without considering warehouse capacity, transportation availability, downstream implications, or cost-to-serve.

Moore characterizes this as both an old problem and a new one, and it remains a costly challenge.

 

Volatility, Blind Spots & Self-Inflicted Costs

Because planning technologies operate in disconnected silos, companies unintentionally create large pools of hidden costs. Moore shared examples such as networks shipping 23 loads on a lane one day and only two the next—simply because planning logic triggers replenishment without coordination.

At times, these inconsistencies can force warehouses to overstaff. In one case, a Southern California operation carried twelve additional employees strictly to handle unpredictable peaks, at a cost to the organization of about $1 million in annual labor expense.

Moore emphasized that these hidden costs aren’t just financial; they place unnecessary stress on teams through overtime, firefighting, and constantly shifting workloads. “Planning shoots virtually every part of the company in the foot,” he noted. The real issue: most organizations don’t recognize the full cost of volatility or the impact of their own decisions.

 

AI: Promise, Hype & the Gap in the Middle

When asked about newer challenges confronting supply chain planners in 2025, Moore pointed to AI. While AI is often positioned as the next great leap, he believes the technology is still widely misunderstood. Current systems—planning, ordering, transportation, warehousing—do not speak a common language. Until companies implement true agentic AI, capable of orchestrating all functions through a cohesive, cross-functional master plan, the technology will not achieve its full potential.

Despite industry claims, Moore says no one has fully reached this level of capability yet. Companies must “transact in reality” and recognize where AI is today—not where marketing suggests it is.

 

Real Progress: Leveling the Network

While Moore acknowledged that he hasn’t yet solved the problem of organizational apathy—the tendency to cling to the status quo—ProvisionAI has cracked one of the industry’s most persistent issues: supply planning volatility.

The company’s patented LevelLoad® technology levels inventory and transportation activity across an entire network for the next 30 days. It is a complex mathematical and AI challenge, but according to Moore, the results speak for themselves: fewer peaks, fewer staffing emergencies, smoother flows, and dramatically reduced transportation and warehousing costs.

 

Learn More

Moore encourages anyone interested in learning more to visit ProvisionAI.com or reach out to him on LinkedIn. His practical, reality-first approach stands out in a noisy landscape—proving that sometimes the biggest breakthroughs start with seeing the costs hiding in plain sight.

We also invite you to listen to the full audio version of this interview with Scott W. Luton and Tom Moore: click here.

More Blogs

supply chain control tower technology
Blogs
December 22, 2025

Top Microsoft Dynamics 365 Partners for Distribution and Supply Chain Management

This post is written by our friends at Winfosoft. Winfosoft is a globally recognized Microsoft Cloud Services Provider with more than 30 years of experience in ERP software solutions. Learn more at: https://winfosoft.com/   Choosing a Microsoft Dynamics 365 partner is a major decision for any distributor. The right team can help improve inventory visibility, reduce errors and give leaders clearer numbers to work with. Using the wrong one can slow things down and create more manual work. This guide explores partners with proven experience in distribution and supply chain operations. Each has a slightly different focus, so readers can see which model fits their business best.   What Dynamics 365 Partners Specialize in the Distribution Industry? Microsoft Dynamics 365 combines finance, operations, sales and customer information in one system. For distributors, this means a single place to manage stock, pricing, orders and warehouse activity across locations. Specialized partners build on that core system. They design the processes and integrations that align with how distributors actually operate their businesses. This list highlights partners based on their clear focus on distribution, demonstrated experience with Dynamics 365 and independent coverage published in the last few years.   1. Winfosoft Winfosoft is a…
circular economy
Blogs
April 3, 2026

Are You Sure Consumers Are the Unlock for Circularity?

written by Deborah Dull, on site at GreenBiz 2026   One of the most repeated excuses in the circular economy space is that American consumers just do not care enough. They will not sort their waste. They will not pay a premium for sustainable products. They will not participate in take-back programs. Europe is different, the story goes. Americans are a lost cause. Today I sat through a panel where that story got taken apart, piece by piece, with actual data. On this panel were Tom Szaky the CEO at TerraCycle and Loop, Gary Lewis the CEO at Resourcify, Rob Whitter the Head of Climate and Sustainability at Visa, and Casper Venbjerg Hansen the Senior Director of Sustainability Risk & Compliance for Ambu A/S; all facilitated by Lauren Phipps of MOLG. A company that runs in-store recycling programs across more than a million locations in 20 countries looked at their numbers. Whether someone was bringing back a wetsuit in Japan, cosmetics in France, or gear in the United States, the behavior was statistically identical. You could not tell the countries apart. American consumers who chose to participate were participating at the exact same rate as everyone else. Then there was…