Share:

Anything is Possible: Josh Gruenstein on AI Workers, Throughput Pressure, and the Next Revenue Lever in Supply Chain

At Manifest 2026, Scott Luton spent time with Josh Gruenstein, Co-Founder and CEO of Tutor Intelligence, to talk about a future that’s no longer theoretical: AI-powered robot workers operating inside America’s warehouses and factories. And this isn’t a science experiment. It’s already happening.

 

From MIT to the Warehouse Floor

Gruenstein and his team came out of MIT’s Computer Science and AI Lab with a bold idea: build AI-powered robot workers that can handle the manual labor people don’t want to do.

“We build physical robots,” Gruenstein explained. “We build AI models that enable robots to perceive their environments, and then we deploy those robots into factories and warehouses across the United States to do manual labor that people don’t want to do.”

Unlike traditional automation projects that require massive capital outlays, Tutor Intelligence operates on a robots-as-a-service model. Companies can engage a Tutor robot for roughly $14–$18 an hour, creating a flexible, scalable path to automation without multimillion-dollar implementation risk.

 

Automation Isn’t New. AI Is Changing the Playbook.

When asked about dominant supply chain themes, Gruenstein pointed to a constant drumbeat: automation. But 2026 feels different.

“Automation is obviously a constant theme,” he said. “What really seems different this year is people are understanding where that automation is going to come from and what are the technological drivers.”

AI is no longer a buzzword floating above the show floor. Leaders are beginning to understand how it directly drives productivity and throughput on the warehouse floor.

And that matters, because supply chain leaders are facing an increasingly difficult mandate.

 

Higher Throughput. Lower Cost. Same Margin?

One of the top challenges Gruenstein sees in customer conversations is the classic squeeze:

Deliver more throughput.
Deliver it faster.
Deliver it cheaper.

“We definitely see people being asked to deliver the throughput at lower cost,” he said. “How do you square that circle?”

Traditional automation often requires significant capital investment and long payback cycles. That risk (and occasional failure), especially when combined with less-than-focused leadership direction when it comes to technology, has contributed to considerable heartburn in supply chain organizations; including AI fatigue.

Gruenstein is candid about it.

“We’ve seen this in automation for years. People spend millions of dollars. It doesn’t work out. And now it’s, ‘robots don’t work.’”

But the issue isn’t the technology itself.

“It’s not about the AI. It’s about: can you build solutions that improve productivity and efficiency? The proof is in the pudding.”

Seeing real productivity gains on the warehouse floor, not just slides in a boardroom, is what cuts through fatigue and drives action.

 

From Cost Center to Revenue Driver

Perhaps the most intriguing insight from the conversation wasn’t about labor savings; it was about revenue opportunity.

Robots don’t get tired. They don’t slow down on complex orders. They don’t care how heavy a box is.

If a 3PL can deploy robots that operate at a predictable flat rate, fulfillment complexity becomes less volatile from a cost perspective.

“You’ve suddenly doubled or tripled your margin on your fulfillment to your customer,” Gruenstein noted.

In that model, robotics isn’t just reducing operating expense; it’s unlocking new pricing strategies and competitive advantage. Automation becomes a growth engine.

 

A Strategic Shift from 3PL Leaders

One of Gruenstein’s biggest takeaways from Manifest wasn’t about technology at all. It was about the people leading supply chain transformation.

“The proactivity and level of strategic thinking that we’re seeing from business leaders is really cool to see,” he said.

There’s both a push and a pull happening in the industry. Technology companies are pushing innovation forward, but supply chain practitioners are pulling in solutions with sharper intent, evaluating what actually delivers productivity, flexibility, and margin improvement.

That strategic maturity may be the biggest shift of all.

 

The Art of the Possible

Tutor Intelligence now has a 85-person team in Boston, including PhDs and supply chain veterans working side-by-side to turn AI robotics into practical, deployable solutions.

The bigger picture? The art of the possible is expanding rapidly.

Automation is no longer limited to static conveyor systems or million-dollar builds. AI-powered robots can now be deployed incrementally, flexibly, and affordably.

And in an environment where leaders are asked to do more with less, that combination may be exactly what the industry needs.

Because if throughput must rise while costs fall, something has to change. For Gruenstein, that “something” is already rolling across warehouse floors.

 

Where to Learn More

Connect with Josh Gruenstein with Tutor Intelligence here on LinkedIn. We invite you to check out the company’s website, where you can review current products, as well as big upcoming announcements: https://tutorintelligence.com/

More Blogs

supply chain planning
Blogs
December 15, 2025

Uncovering Hidden Costs in Supply Chain Planning: Tom Moore of ProvisionAI on What Companies Miss

In today’s increasingly complex global supply chain landscape, Tom Moore keeps his message refreshingly straightforward: ProvisionAI helps large companies discover hidden costs and eliminate them. Organizations such as Procter & Gamble, Nestlé, and Unilever have leveraged the company’s technology to uncover and eliminate inefficiencies—particularly in transportation and warehousing—that traditional systems fail to detect. The outcome is significant and often delivers immediate savings. But Moore believes many of these problems stem from misunderstandings about the very technologies companies rely on.   Misnamed Systems & Misaligned Expectations Before the interview officially began, Moore reflected on the surprisingly inaccurate names assigned to modern supply chain technologies. ERP systems rarely plan resources across the enterprise, despite what their name suggests. Warehouse Management Systems, while certainly used in warehouses, don’t actually “manage” much at all. People behind keyboards still make most of the critical decisions. This disconnect in terminology shapes faulty expectations. Many organizations believe their planning systems will truly plan the supply chain, yet most tools merely react to demand signals. If ABC Company orders ten cases, the system automatically replenishes—without considering warehouse capacity, transportation availability, downstream implications, or cost-to-serve. Moore characterizes this as both an old problem and a new one, and it…
supply chain
Blogs
January 15, 2026

5 Supply Chain Predictions on our 2026 Bingo Card

Special Guest Blog Post written by Philip Vervloesem   If your supply chain planning still runs on a monthly cycle, 2026 will be uncomfortable. We are operating in a polycrisis where change is constant, and responses need to be fast enough to keep up. From customer conversations, industry research, and leadership discussions at the Gartner supply chain conferences, a clear pattern has emerged: the organizations pulling ahead are not planning more often. They are embedding agility, intelligence, and speed into the way they make decisions. Here are five predictions shaping supply chain excellence in 2026 – our “bingo card” for what’s now table stakes.   1. Continuous, always-on planning is a must Monthly or quarterly cycles are no longer enough. The organizations that outperform treat planning as a continuous capability embedded in daily operations, and make it part of their governance and operational excellence. Imagine this: a sudden surge in demand hits or a supplier flags a delay. Instead of waiting for the next planning cycle, teams immediately evaluate options, share insights across functions, and adjust course. Planning stops being a calendar exercise and starts shaping real-time decisions.   “By shifting from process-centric to decision-centric planning, we now run hundreds…