Share:

Breaking Down Silos and Gaining Speed: Manhattan Associates on Unifying Planning and Execution

At the Gartner Supply Chain Planning Summit in Denver, Scott Luton sat down with two leaders from Manhattan Associates—Brett Lindner, Director of Product for Supply Chain Planning, and Ryan Gifford—Senior Director of Strategic Business Development. Together, the conversations painted a clear picture of one of the most persistent challenges in supply chain—and one of the biggest opportunities ahead: unifying planning and execution to drive agility, visibility, and better outcomes.

 

A Unified View of the Supply Chain

Manhattan Associates is widely known for its strength in supply chain execution, spanning warehouse management, transportation management, labor management, and order management. As both Lindner and Gifford emphasized, what differentiates Manhattan today is its unified platform that brings execution and planning together—not as loosely connected systems, but as a single, cohesive foundation.

Lindner explained that Manhattan helps companies model and design their future supply chains, enabling better planning decisions that directly inform execution. Gifford echoed that point, describing Manhattan’s approach as “two formerly siloed applications now dancing in unison”—all driven by a shared inventory and decision framework.

 

The Old Problem That Won’t Go Away: Silos

When asked about old and new challenges in supply chain planning, both leaders pointed to the same core issue: silos.

Despite advances in technology, many organizations still generate plans that never meaningfully connect to execution. Critical information—such as purchase commitments, promotional intent, or allocation priorities—often fails to travel downstream. As a result, warehouses, transportation teams, and stores are forced to make decisions without the context planners already have.

Lindner noted that this disconnect leads to missed opportunities and unnecessary costs. Promotional inventory may be secured and funded, but if it doesn’t reach the right location at the right time, companies lose sales and carry excess inventory longer than planned. Worse, when execution systems don’t provide feedback upstream, planners may never realize that product is sitting idle in a warehouse.

 

From Integration to True Unification

One of the most important distinctions Lindner made was between integration and unification. Integration often means sharing limited data between systems after decisions are made. Manhattan’s approach—building execution and planning on a single platform—allows far richer information sharing and collaboration.

This unified architecture enables organizations to align on a single strategy from end to end: from purchasing and supplier commitments, to warehouse prioritization, to delivery at the customer’s doorstep. The result is fewer blind spots, faster decision-making, and a supply chain that operates as one system rather than a collection of disconnected parts.

 

Speed, Agility, and Time as a Competitive Weapon

Gifford highlighted another recurring theme from customer conversations: speed. Today’s supply chains operate in an environment where commerce moves faster than ever, and disruptions emerge constantly. Poor visibility, slow reactions, and unclear data are no longer tolerable weaknesses.

Manhattan’s focus, he explained, is enabling customers to see what’s happening in near real time—and respond just as quickly. Agility becomes the differentiator. The sooner a company can identify a potential issue or opportunity, the sooner it can mitigate risk or capture value.

Gifford described time as a currency: the faster an organization can act, the greater its advantage. Using a sports analogy, he likened Manhattan’s approach to a “bend, don’t break” defense—providing structure and flexibility so companies can absorb shocks without giving up the big play.

 

Connecting With Manhattan Associates

Both leaders encouraged supply chain professionals to continue the conversation via LinkedIn: Brett Lindner and Ryan Gifford. They also encouraged listeners to check out Manhattan Associates’ company website at manh.com.

As the summit underscored, the future of supply chain planning isn’t just smarter plans—it’s plans that move, adapt, and execute in real time, powered by a truly unified platform.

We invite you to check out the full audio interviews of Scott Luton’s chats with Brett Lindner and Ryan Gifford (click here).

More Blogs

large language models
Blogs
June 26, 2026

AI Is Good at Picking Qualified Suppliers. It Still Struggles to Pick the Best One.

Companies are rapidly integrating generative AI into procurement and sourcing decisions. The promise is obvious. AI can read thousands of pages of supplier proposals faster than any human team, summarize technical requirements in seconds, and create the appearance of consistency and objectivity in evaluation. But there is an important distinction managers are starting to overlook. The same AI system that performs extremely well at identifying whether a supplier meets minimum requirements may perform much less reliably when judging which supplier is truly better. Recent research published in the Journal of Business Logistics examined this issue by comparing how large language models evaluated supplier bids against evaluations completed by experienced procurement professionals. It analyzed 123 supplier proposals tied to 31 public procurement projects conducted by the State of Ohio between 2023 and 2024. The projects involved complex IT services contracts, many containing large, text-heavy bid packages requiring evaluative judgment rather than simple arithmetic comparisons. The researchers tested three reasoning-oriented AI models: OpenAI o3, Grok-3-Mini, and DeepSeek R1. They then compared their evaluations against human procurement scores. The findings revealed a surprisingly clear pattern. AI performed well when evaluating compliance signals. These are signals tied to baseline qualifications and technical requirements. Does…
demand spikes
Blogs
May 26, 2026

When Demand Spikes Overnight: A Practical Guide to Demand Signal Management

Demand can change in an instant. A flash promotion takes off faster than expected. An influencer post sends a niche SKU into the stratosphere. A heat wave flips seasonal demand on its head. And suddenly, your forecast—carefully crafted weeks ago—feels like yesterday’s weather report. This is where demand signal management earns its keep. Instead of reacting too late or overreacting too early, it helps supply chain teams interpret what’s really happening and respond with confidence. For retailers and consumer brands navigating constant demand volatility, it’s the difference between chasing noise and acting on insight.   The problem: demand forecasts lag reality Traditional forecasting has a fundamental challenge: timing. Forecasts are built on historical patterns and planning cadences that move at a measured pace, but demand levels today won’t wait for the next planning cycle. Modern demand shocks often arrive without warning: a promotional discount goes viral, a competitor runs out of stock, weather drives sudden regional swings, or a trend outpaces merchandising plans. In these moments, planners face a familiar tension. React too slowly, and shelves go empty. React too aggressively, and you’re stuck with excess inventory once the spike fades.   What demand signals are (and what they aren’t)…