Share:

E2open’s John Lash on Global Trade Turbulence, Tariff Whiplash, and the Rise of Agentic AI

At the 2025 Gartner Supply Chain Planning Summit in Denver, Scott Luton met with John Lash, who leads strategy and vision at e2open, a WiseTech Global Group company. E2open is a global platform powering the entire lifecycle of making, moving, and selling goods, with capabilities spanning planning, logistics, global trade, supply management, and procurement. The platform is designed not just for enterprise visibility but for true end-to-end coordination across extended supply chain ecosystems.

Lash emphasized that disruptions rarely originate within a company’s four walls. “Your sub-tiers are where most of the risk lives,” he explained. “That’s where your day-to-day operations—and your long-term strategy—are truly shaped.” It’s a lesson sharply reinforced during the pandemic, which reminded leaders worldwide that no one does supply chain alone.

 

Old Challenges Intensified by New Realities

When Luton asked about the biggest challenges facing planning teams today, Lash pointed immediately to constraints—supply constraints, manufacturing constraints, and now, the added layer of global trade volatility.

Trade policies that once shifted every few years now change weekly, daily, or even hourly. Lash offered a striking example: Brazilian coffee duties jumped from 10% to 50% this summer—before returning to 0%. “How do you plan through that?” he asked. “How does a CEO make decisions with uncertainty spelled with a capital U?”

It’s not just cost volatility. Tariff changes can cause spikes and dips in demand, disrupting both sides of the planning equation. And as Lash underscored, spreadsheets simply can’t keep up. The pace of global trade and geopolitical change has outstripped manual processes entirely.

 

The Good News: Unified Platforms and Agentic AI

The conversation shifted to the innovations e2open is most excited about—and agentic AI topped the list.

Agentic AI changes the way planners work by enabling goal-oriented queries, where a human or machine asks for an outcome, and the system orchestrates the end-to-end actions required to achieve it. This shifts planning from siloed tasks to holistic decision flows.

Instead of a planner handing work to logistics, who hands work to trade compliance, who hands work to procurement, agentic AI can help one person execute the entire problem from start to finish.

Lash sees this not only as a solution to talent gaps but a breakthrough in workflow orchestration:
“It transforms not just the processes, but the organization itself.”

He views this moment as one of the most transformative of his career. “I wish I were 20 years younger to ride this wave,” he admitted, “because what’s happening now is extraordinary.”

 

Why This Moment Matters

Despite joking about the “good old days” of relatively stable supply chains, Lash believes today is just as exciting—if not more. Companies that embrace modern planning technology, real-time trade intelligence, and agentic AI will outperform peers. In fact, Lash warned that the competitive stakes ahead could be stark: from market leaders to bankruptcy filings.

“Supply chain is the heart of every business,” he said. “Organizations that do this well will have the edge.”

 

Connect With e2open

Lash encourages leaders to visit e2open.com or connect with the team via LinkedIn to explore how these innovations are being put into action across global supply chains. Connect or follow John Lash on LinkedIn here.

We also invite you to check out the full audio version of this interview with Scott W. Luton and John Lash: click here.

More Blogs

supply chain planning
Blogs
December 15, 2025

Uncovering Hidden Costs in Supply Chain Planning: Tom Moore of ProvisionAI on What Companies Miss

In today’s increasingly complex global supply chain landscape, Tom Moore keeps his message refreshingly straightforward: ProvisionAI helps large companies discover hidden costs and eliminate them. Organizations such as Procter & Gamble, Nestlé, and Unilever have leveraged the company’s technology to uncover and eliminate inefficiencies—particularly in transportation and warehousing—that traditional systems fail to detect. The outcome is significant and often delivers immediate savings. But Moore believes many of these problems stem from misunderstandings about the very technologies companies rely on.   Misnamed Systems & Misaligned Expectations Before the interview officially began, Moore reflected on the surprisingly inaccurate names assigned to modern supply chain technologies. ERP systems rarely plan resources across the enterprise, despite what their name suggests. Warehouse Management Systems, while certainly used in warehouses, don’t actually “manage” much at all. People behind keyboards still make most of the critical decisions. This disconnect in terminology shapes faulty expectations. Many organizations believe their planning systems will truly plan the supply chain, yet most tools merely react to demand signals. If ABC Company orders ten cases, the system automatically replenishes—without considering warehouse capacity, transportation availability, downstream implications, or cost-to-serve. Moore characterizes this as both an old problem and a new one, and it…
supply chain management
Blogs
June 26, 2026

AI Is Good at Picking Qualified Suppliers. It Still Struggles to Pick the Best One.

Companies are rapidly integrating generative AI into procurement and sourcing decisions. The promise is obvious. AI can read thousands of pages of supplier proposals faster than any human team, summarize technical requirements in seconds, and create the appearance of consistency and objectivity in evaluation. But there is an important distinction managers are starting to overlook. The same AI system that performs extremely well at identifying whether a supplier meets minimum requirements may perform much less reliably when judging which supplier is truly better. Recent research published in the Journal of Business Logistics examined this issue by comparing how large language models evaluated supplier bids against evaluations completed by experienced procurement professionals. It analyzed 123 supplier proposals tied to 31 public procurement projects conducted by the State of Ohio between 2023 and 2024. The projects involved complex IT services contracts, many containing large, text-heavy bid packages requiring evaluative judgment rather than simple arithmetic comparisons. The researchers tested three reasoning-oriented AI models: OpenAI o3, Grok-3-Mini, and DeepSeek R1. They then compared their evaluations against human procurement scores. The findings revealed a surprisingly clear pattern. AI performed well when evaluating compliance signals. These are signals tied to baseline qualifications and technical requirements. Does…