Mallery Dosdall

Customers blame retailers less when the delay notification comes from someone else   When something goes wrong, most companies reach for the same playbook: communicate early, communicate often, and keep customers informed. It is difficult to argue with that logic. Customers hate surprises, and transparency has become a cornerstone of good service. Whether the issue is a delayed shipment, a production disruption, or a missed commitment, managers generally assume that more communication demonstrates accountability and builds trust. New research published in the Journal of Business Logistics suggests the real lesson is narrower and more useful than “communicate more.” The study shows that communication does more than transfer information. It also shapes how customers assign responsibility. The volume of communication was not what mattered. The identity of the messenger was. Researchers presented consumers with identical delivery delays following an online purchase. In the study, the same standard emails were sent to every participant: an order confirmation, a shipment notice, and a delivery confirmation. What varied was only how customers learned about the delay itself. Some received a delay notification from the retailer, some from the carrier, and others discovered the delay on their own through package tracking. The delivery outcome was…

“How to Create the Best Retail Customer Experience: 3 Trends to Know” for SAP. Read the Full Article Here.