Share:

Inside the Supply Chain War Room: Max Garland on Backup Plans, Delivery Costs & the Human Side of Innovation

At Manifest 2026, Scott Luton shared a cup of coffee with Max Garland, Senior Reporter at Supply Chain Dive, an Informa TechTarget publication, for a boots-on-the-ground perspective from one of the industry’s most plugged-in observers.

Garland covers freight, logistics, retail fulfillment, and parcel delivery: the parts of the supply chain where strategy meets reality. And after a bruising 2025, he sees an industry that’s not just reacting anymore. It’s recalibrating.

 

From Plan B to Plan D

If 2025 had a theme, Garland says it was contingency planning.

“Last year was when a lot of companies were putting together those Plan B’s, Plan C’s, and Plan D’s,” he explained, pointing to tariff upheaval and shifting trade policy that forced leaders into constant reaction mode.

Companies prioritized flexibility: diversifying sourcing, adjusting procurement strategies, and preparing for fires wherever they might spark. In 2026, that flexibility remains. But the tone has shifted.

Now companies are “firming up their plans, fine-tuning, making sure those back-up plans are cost-effective as well.” It’s no longer just about avoiding disruption; it’s about operating efficiently within it.

In other words, supply chain leaders aren’t just jumping over candlesticks anymore (like Jack from the old nursery rhyme). They’re strengthening their footing and ability to make leaps and bounds, depending on the size of the flame.

 

Battle-Tested Leaders, Smarter Partnerships

Garland believes today’s supply chain professionals are better equipped than ever.

“These are battle-worn professionals,” he said. Leaders who have navigated multiple trade regimes, pandemic shocks, and policy pivots now have scars – – and experience.

They also appear more open.

Big companies are increasingly willing to partner with startups and new solution providers, something less common a decade or two ago. Whether accelerated by trade wars, pandemic pressure, or competitive intensity, the willingness to seek outside help has grown.

That openness is unlocking new innovation pathways across supply chain ecosystem everywhere.

 

Delivery Costs: The Pressure Point

If Garland had to put one challenge at the top of his short list, it would be delivery costs. Although his reporting focus may create just a tad bit of bias there.

Nevertheless, as companies try to offset tariff impacts and upstream volatility, they’re scrutinizing every line item cost. And last mile delivery is a big one.

Fuel prices fluctuate. Rural delivery expands. Same-day delivery expectations, amongst others, grow.

“You want good value and good pricing,” Garland said, “but you don’t want that at the expense of service.”

Consumer expectations aren’t retreating. Amazon’s massive same-day growth underscores that demand remains strong, especially in essentials like grocery and healthcare items.

The real question isn’t whether same-day matters. It’s where it makes sense.

 

Innovation: From Packaging to Partnerships

So how are companies responding? Garland points to both operational creativity and relationship management.

On the operational side:

  • Rightsizing packaging
  • Consolidating orders
  • Encouraging customers to bundle shipments
  • Using robotics to reduce fulfillment costs

These are practical, margin-protecting moves. But innovation isn’t just technological.

“Anything’s negotiable with these carriers,” Garland noted. Relationships still matter.

Carriers want the right volume mix. Shippers want cost control without sacrificing service. Transparent conversations about distribution center routing, lane optimization, and volume allocation can unlock savings without destabilizing service levels.

It’s not vendor versus shipper. It’s partnership.

 

Transparency as a Competitive Edge

One of the most promising trends Garland sees at Manifest 2026 is improved transparency between shippers and carriers.

New platforms are enabling better visibility, trust, and volume alignment. When both sides see the same data and understand mutual constraints, friction decreases. And in a margin-sensitive environment, friction is expensive.

The goal isn’t squeezing carriers for every penny; but rather, it’s aligning incentives so both parties win.

 

The War Room Effect

Perhaps the most powerful insight from Garland’s time at Manifest wasn’t about robots or drones, though he admits those are pretty cool and are hard to ignore.

It was the war room energy. In sessions, leaders walked through real-time decision frameworks:

  • Do we move sourcing?
  • Do we wait out this tariff?
  • Do we shift suppliers or hold steady?

“You get to feel like you’re in the war room almost,” Garland said.

It’s that mix of tech demos alongside tactical strategy & frank discussions that makes Manifest unique.

You see the robots. You hear the negotiations. You feel the pressure. And you leave with perspective.

 

Tech Forward. Human Centered.

Garland’s view is balanced. Robotics, drones, and automation are clearly reshaping supply chains. But human relationships: between carriers and shippers, startups and enterprises, sourcing teams and partners – – they remain foundational.

The future may be more automated. But it’s still negotiated, strategized, and executed by people.

And according to one of the industry’s sharpest observers, that blend of tech and trust may be the defining story of 2026.

 

Where to Learn More

Connect with Max Garland here on LinkedIn. We invite you to check out Supply Chain Dive here, as well as the full family of Informa TechTarget publications here.

More Blogs

fulfillment automation
Blogs
February 20, 2026

Designing Resilience In: David Scheffrahn of Ocado Intelligent Automation on Flexibility, Volatility, and the Future of Fulfillment

From Grocery Innovator to Global Tech Enabler At Manifest 2026, Scott Luton spent time with David Scheffrahn, Vice President of Sales with Ocado Intelligent Automation, to explore how fulfillment technology is evolving in an era defined by volatility. While Ocado is widely known in the UK and Europe for its e-commerce grocery leadership, Scheffrahn explained that the company’s North American focus is different. Over 25 years of building its own advanced grocery e-commerce and fulfillment operations, Ocado developed a powerful technology stack to drive efficiency. “What we’ve done in the last five years,” he shared, “has taken the tech stack that we built for our own use, and now we’re offering it to other companies to buy and use for their operations.” Today, Ocado supports 3PLs and global brands with end-to-end automation solutions that enable companies to maintain greater control over their omnichannel fulfillment, especially those looking for alternatives to marketplace giants.   Volatility Hasn’t Gone Away When asked about dominant supply chain themes heading into 2026, Scheffrahn was direct: “Volatility has not gone away.” He described 2025 as “a massive shock in the system,” with tariffs and shifting trade policies forcing customers to pause projects and reassess strategy. “Almost…
inventory control
Blogs
July 16, 2026

The Sales You’re Losing to an Inventory Record

Inventory audits may be one of retail’s most overlooked revenue opportunities. Every large retailer has invested in software that predicts demand, triggers replenishment, and manages shelf space with precision. Almost none of that software questions whether the inventory number it’s reading is actually correct. A recent study in the Journal of Business Logistics suggests that blind spot is expensive, and that fixing it is one of the more overlooked levers a retailer has for growing sales. The researchers, working with a major UK grocery chain, examined roughly 24,000 products across 11 stores to understand why inventory records drift from what’s physically on the shelf, a problem known in the industry as inventory record inaccuracy. They then ran a field experiment to measure what happens to sales when a store corrects those records through a full audit. The results reframe a task most retailers treat as a nuisance into something closer to a growth strategy. Start with why the records go wrong in the first place. The study found that products carrying more inventory and products replenished more often were significantly more prone to inaccuracy. That makes intuitive sense: every case broken down, every unit moved from backroom to shelf, is…