Share:

Inside the Supply Chain War Room: Max Garland on Backup Plans, Delivery Costs & the Human Side of Innovation

At Manifest 2026, Scott Luton shared a cup of coffee with Max Garland, Senior Reporter at Supply Chain Dive, an Informa TechTarget publication, for a boots-on-the-ground perspective from one of the industry’s most plugged-in observers.

Garland covers freight, logistics, retail fulfillment, and parcel delivery: the parts of the supply chain where strategy meets reality. And after a bruising 2025, he sees an industry that’s not just reacting anymore. It’s recalibrating.

 

From Plan B to Plan D

If 2025 had a theme, Garland says it was contingency planning.

“Last year was when a lot of companies were putting together those Plan B’s, Plan C’s, and Plan D’s,” he explained, pointing to tariff upheaval and shifting trade policy that forced leaders into constant reaction mode.

Companies prioritized flexibility: diversifying sourcing, adjusting procurement strategies, and preparing for fires wherever they might spark. In 2026, that flexibility remains. But the tone has shifted.

Now companies are “firming up their plans, fine-tuning, making sure those back-up plans are cost-effective as well.” It’s no longer just about avoiding disruption; it’s about operating efficiently within it.

In other words, supply chain leaders aren’t just jumping over candlesticks anymore (like Jack from the old nursery rhyme). They’re strengthening their footing and ability to make leaps and bounds, depending on the size of the flame.

 

Battle-Tested Leaders, Smarter Partnerships

Garland believes today’s supply chain professionals are better equipped than ever.

“These are battle-worn professionals,” he said. Leaders who have navigated multiple trade regimes, pandemic shocks, and policy pivots now have scars – – and experience.

They also appear more open.

Big companies are increasingly willing to partner with startups and new solution providers, something less common a decade or two ago. Whether accelerated by trade wars, pandemic pressure, or competitive intensity, the willingness to seek outside help has grown.

That openness is unlocking new innovation pathways across supply chain ecosystem everywhere.

 

Delivery Costs: The Pressure Point

If Garland had to put one challenge at the top of his short list, it would be delivery costs. Although his reporting focus may create just a tad bit of bias there.

Nevertheless, as companies try to offset tariff impacts and upstream volatility, they’re scrutinizing every line item cost. And last mile delivery is a big one.

Fuel prices fluctuate. Rural delivery expands. Same-day delivery expectations, amongst others, grow.

“You want good value and good pricing,” Garland said, “but you don’t want that at the expense of service.”

Consumer expectations aren’t retreating. Amazon’s massive same-day growth underscores that demand remains strong, especially in essentials like grocery and healthcare items.

The real question isn’t whether same-day matters. It’s where it makes sense.

 

Innovation: From Packaging to Partnerships

So how are companies responding? Garland points to both operational creativity and relationship management.

On the operational side:

  • Rightsizing packaging
  • Consolidating orders
  • Encouraging customers to bundle shipments
  • Using robotics to reduce fulfillment costs

These are practical, margin-protecting moves. But innovation isn’t just technological.

“Anything’s negotiable with these carriers,” Garland noted. Relationships still matter.

Carriers want the right volume mix. Shippers want cost control without sacrificing service. Transparent conversations about distribution center routing, lane optimization, and volume allocation can unlock savings without destabilizing service levels.

It’s not vendor versus shipper. It’s partnership.

 

Transparency as a Competitive Edge

One of the most promising trends Garland sees at Manifest 2026 is improved transparency between shippers and carriers.

New platforms are enabling better visibility, trust, and volume alignment. When both sides see the same data and understand mutual constraints, friction decreases. And in a margin-sensitive environment, friction is expensive.

The goal isn’t squeezing carriers for every penny; but rather, it’s aligning incentives so both parties win.

 

The War Room Effect

Perhaps the most powerful insight from Garland’s time at Manifest wasn’t about robots or drones, though he admits those are pretty cool and are hard to ignore.

It was the war room energy. In sessions, leaders walked through real-time decision frameworks:

  • Do we move sourcing?
  • Do we wait out this tariff?
  • Do we shift suppliers or hold steady?

“You get to feel like you’re in the war room almost,” Garland said.

It’s that mix of tech demos alongside tactical strategy & frank discussions that makes Manifest unique.

You see the robots. You hear the negotiations. You feel the pressure. And you leave with perspective.

 

Tech Forward. Human Centered.

Garland’s view is balanced. Robotics, drones, and automation are clearly reshaping supply chains. But human relationships: between carriers and shippers, startups and enterprises, sourcing teams and partners – – they remain foundational.

The future may be more automated. But it’s still negotiated, strategized, and executed by people.

And according to one of the industry’s sharpest observers, that blend of tech and trust may be the defining story of 2026.

 

Where to Learn More

Connect with Max Garland here on LinkedIn. We invite you to check out Supply Chain Dive here, as well as the full family of Informa TechTarget publications here.

More Blogs

global supply chain
Blogs
February 3, 2026

The Value of a Data-Driven Approach to Demand Sensing and Forecasting

Special Guest Blog Post written by Chris Cunnane with InterSystems   Demand sensing and demand forecasting are both crucial aspects of optimizing supply chains, but they do have slightly different functions in their approach and focus. Demand sensing uses real-time data and analytics to identify and respond to immediate demand fluctuations, while demand forecasting uses historical data to predict future demand over a longer period (months or years). Different methods, such as statistical modeling and machine learning, are used to enhance the accuracy and adaptability of these processes. Both areas are crucial for companies when it comes to projecting sales, managing inventory, and coordinating replenishment. In the end, the goal is to accurately predict customer demand by using predictive models to forecast future demand. InterSystems surveyed 450 senior supply chain practitioners and stakeholders to examine key supply chain technology challenges, trends, and decision-making strategies across five key use cases: fulfillment optimization; demand sensing and forecasting; supply chain orchestration; production planning optimization; and environmental, social, and governance (ESG). This blog focuses on demand sensing and forecasting.   Current State of Demand Sensing and Forecasting According to the survey results, when asked how they currently forecast demand, 36% of respondents indicated that…
warranty management optimization
Blogs
June 2, 2026

Your Supply Chain Isn’t Broken. Your Data Is.

written by Chris Cunnane with InterSystems   Supply chain leaders are under constant pressure to move faster, reduce costs, improve resilience, and respond to disruptions in real time. Yet despite billions invested in technology, many organizations still struggle with stockouts, delayed shipments, excess inventory, and unreliable forecasts. The problem may not be the supply chain itself. It may be the data behind it. Most organizations today operate with more supply chain data than ever before. ERP systems, warehouse management platforms, transportation tools, supplier portals, IoT devices, and analytics dashboards generate a nonstop flow of information. On paper, this should create unprecedented visibility. But visibility is not the same as confidence. When inventory data is delayed, supplier updates are inconsistent, and demand signals are fragmented across systems, organizations are forced to make critical decisions using incomplete or unreliable information. The result is a distorted picture of reality, and costly mistakes follow. Companies expedite shipments they didn’t need. They over-order inventory “just in case.” They miss shortages that were hiding in plain sight. And they spend valuable time reconciling conflicting reports instead of solving problems.   The Real Problem: Fragmented Data The challenge isn’t a lack of data. It’s that the data…