Share:

Uncovering Hidden Costs in Supply Chain Planning: Tom Moore of ProvisionAI on What Companies Miss

In today’s increasingly complex global supply chain landscape, Tom Moore keeps his message refreshingly straightforward: ProvisionAI helps large companies discover hidden costs and eliminate them. Organizations such as Procter & Gamble, Nestlé, and Unilever have leveraged the company’s technology to uncover and eliminate inefficiencies—particularly in transportation and warehousing—that traditional systems fail to detect. The outcome is significant and often delivers immediate savings.

But Moore believes many of these problems stem from misunderstandings about the very technologies companies rely on.

 

Misnamed Systems & Misaligned Expectations

Before the interview officially began, Moore reflected on the surprisingly inaccurate names assigned to modern supply chain technologies. ERP systems rarely plan resources across the enterprise, despite what their name suggests. Warehouse Management Systems, while certainly used in warehouses, don’t actually “manage” much at all. People behind keyboards still make most of the critical decisions.

This disconnect in terminology shapes faulty expectations. Many organizations believe their planning systems will truly plan the supply chain, yet most tools merely react to demand signals. If ABC Company orders ten cases, the system automatically replenishes—without considering warehouse capacity, transportation availability, downstream implications, or cost-to-serve.

Moore characterizes this as both an old problem and a new one, and it remains a costly challenge.

 

Volatility, Blind Spots & Self-Inflicted Costs

Because planning technologies operate in disconnected silos, companies unintentionally create large pools of hidden costs. Moore shared examples such as networks shipping 23 loads on a lane one day and only two the next—simply because planning logic triggers replenishment without coordination.

At times, these inconsistencies can force warehouses to overstaff. In one case, a Southern California operation carried twelve additional employees strictly to handle unpredictable peaks, at a cost to the organization of about $1 million in annual labor expense.

Moore emphasized that these hidden costs aren’t just financial; they place unnecessary stress on teams through overtime, firefighting, and constantly shifting workloads. “Planning shoots virtually every part of the company in the foot,” he noted. The real issue: most organizations don’t recognize the full cost of volatility or the impact of their own decisions.

 

AI: Promise, Hype & the Gap in the Middle

When asked about newer challenges confronting supply chain planners in 2025, Moore pointed to AI. While AI is often positioned as the next great leap, he believes the technology is still widely misunderstood. Current systems—planning, ordering, transportation, warehousing—do not speak a common language. Until companies implement true agentic AI, capable of orchestrating all functions through a cohesive, cross-functional master plan, the technology will not achieve its full potential.

Despite industry claims, Moore says no one has fully reached this level of capability yet. Companies must “transact in reality” and recognize where AI is today—not where marketing suggests it is.

 

Real Progress: Leveling the Network

While Moore acknowledged that he hasn’t yet solved the problem of organizational apathy—the tendency to cling to the status quo—ProvisionAI has cracked one of the industry’s most persistent issues: supply planning volatility.

The company’s patented LevelLoad® technology levels inventory and transportation activity across an entire network for the next 30 days. It is a complex mathematical and AI challenge, but according to Moore, the results speak for themselves: fewer peaks, fewer staffing emergencies, smoother flows, and dramatically reduced transportation and warehousing costs.

 

Learn More

Moore encourages anyone interested in learning more to visit ProvisionAI.com or reach out to him on LinkedIn. His practical, reality-first approach stands out in a noisy landscape—proving that sometimes the biggest breakthroughs start with seeing the costs hiding in plain sight.

We also invite you to listen to the full audio version of this interview with Scott W. Luton and Tom Moore: click here.

More Blogs

supply chain culture
Blogs
February 25, 2026

Culture Over Clicks: Marina Mayer on Workforce, Proactivity, and the Real Innovation Story at Manifest 2026

At Manifest 2026, Scott Luton caught up with Marina Mayer, Editor-in-Chief of Food Logistics and Supply & Demand Chain Executive, and Co-Founder and Content Director of the Women in Supply Chain Forum, for a conversation that cut through the tech buzz and landed squarely on what matters most: people. Marina leads two influential digital publications covering the full spectrum of supply chain — from temperature-controlled cold chain logistics to e-commerce and retail — along with four major industry awards programs and the rapidly growing Women in Supply Chain Forum, now entering its fifth year. But amid all the innovation on display in Las Vegas, her message was refreshingly grounded.   Disruption Is the Baseline. Proactivity Is the Shift When asked about dominant themes shaping the industry, Marina didn’t hesitate. One common theme linking 2025 and 2026 is that “disruptions obviously still exist,” she said. From tariffs to trade wars to Mother Nature, the hits keep coming. What’s different in 2026 isn’t the disruption itself; it’s the response. Instead of dwelling on what’s gone wrong, companies are getting proactive. Leaders are “acting on it and being proactive about getting in front of it,” she noted. Since COVID, organizations have learned that…
inventory control
Blogs
July 16, 2026

The Sales You’re Losing to an Inventory Record

Inventory audits may be one of retail’s most overlooked revenue opportunities. Every large retailer has invested in software that predicts demand, triggers replenishment, and manages shelf space with precision. Almost none of that software questions whether the inventory number it’s reading is actually correct. A recent study in the Journal of Business Logistics suggests that blind spot is expensive, and that fixing it is one of the more overlooked levers a retailer has for growing sales. The researchers, working with a major UK grocery chain, examined roughly 24,000 products across 11 stores to understand why inventory records drift from what’s physically on the shelf, a problem known in the industry as inventory record inaccuracy. They then ran a field experiment to measure what happens to sales when a store corrects those records through a full audit. The results reframe a task most retailers treat as a nuisance into something closer to a growth strategy. Start with why the records go wrong in the first place. The study found that products carrying more inventory and products replenished more often were significantly more prone to inaccuracy. That makes intuitive sense: every case broken down, every unit moved from backroom to shelf, is…