Share:

ZS’s Caglar Ozdag on Firefighting, AI Skepticism, and Why Data Must Come First in 2026

At the Gartner Supply Chain Planning Summit in Denver, Scott Luton sat down with Caglar Ozdag, a supply chain leader at ZS. Known for its deep analytics and technology expertise across industries such as life sciences, airlines, consumer goods, and agriculture, ZS has become a trusted partner for organizations looking to elevate their planning and manufacturing performance.

Ozdag leads the firm’s supply chain practice with a focus on planning from detailed forecasting through detailed scheduling. As a former practitioner himself—having led planning operations at large global enterprises—he brings a grounded, real-world perspective to the challenges facing today’s supply chain leaders.

 

Old Problems Persist—and New Ones Are Emerging

When asked about classic and emerging challenges in planning, Ozdag didn’t hesitate: firefighting isn’t going away.

From supply planning disruptions to last-minute schedule changes, firefighting remains a daily reality. “Life happens,” Ozdag noted. Plans rarely match reality, and organizations must constantly adjust. But today, a new layer has been added: AI uncertainty.

Everywhere he goes, leaders are asking the same questions:

  • “Is AI the right investment?”
  • “Will the ROI materialize?”
  • “Are we adopting the right tools, or just chasing hype?”

This blend of enduring complexity and emerging skepticism has become a defining theme of the 2025 planning landscape.

 

How ZS Is Helping Companies Break Through

Despite the challenges, Ozdag is energized by the work ZS is doing—especially in prediction and advanced analytics. If firefighting is inevitable, he emphasized, the goal should be to minimize it.

ZS applies advanced machine learning to supply planning, inventory modeling, cashflow forecasting, and scenario analysis. This offers leaders clear visibility into operations over the next three, six, or twelve months. For Ozdag, these predictive insights are transformational.

“If I had this capability a decade ago when I was at 3M,” he said, “I would have used every single aspect of it.” Visibility, he argued, is the strongest antidote to firefighting.

 

The One Thing Organizations Must Do in 2026

Reflecting on the recent webinar with ZS and Supply Chain Now, Ozdag shared one core takeaway he wishes more organizations would prioritize: invest in the data layer.

He described it as a “cake and candle” situation—without the foundational layers, the top enhancements don’t matter. For supply chains, that foundation is a semantic data layer.

With clean, connected, properly structured data, organizations can unlock:

  • Machine learning
  • GenAI applications
  • Predictive and prescriptive insights
  • Faster, more confident decision-making

“Data drives everything,” Ozdag emphasized. “Get the ontology right, and everything else—AI included—will come.”

 

Where to Learn More

Ozdag encourages leaders to visit ZS.com, where the firm’s supply chain and manufacturing page offers insights, thought leadership, and contact information for the team, including Ozdag and his colleagues. We also invite you to check out a recent Supply Chain Now webinar, featuring Caglar Ozdag and Jim Lee with ZS, hosted by Scott W. Luton and Karin Bursa, entitled: “Reengineering Supply Chain Planning: How to Get More Bang for Your Buck in 2026”: click here.

We also invite you to listen to the audio version of this interview with Scott W. Luton and Caglar Ozdag: click here.

More Blogs

supply chain
Blogs
December 18, 2025

Coupa’s Nari Viswanathan on Autonomous Spend, AI Accessibility, and the Future of Planning

At the Gartner Supply Chain Planning Summit in Denver, Scott Luton sat down with Nari Viswanathan, a veteran innovator in the planning and procurement technology space and a key leader at Coupa. The two reconnected after several recent collaborations—including webinars, industry sessions, and conversations in Dallas—and discussed the new realities of supply chain planning and how organizations are embracing technology like never before.   Coupa and Autonomous Spend Management For those less familiar with Coupa, Viswanathan explained the company as the global leader in autonomous spend management—a framework that brings together direct and indirect spending to help organizations manage total spend more intelligently. Direct spend, of course, is where supply chain operations come into focus, making planning, design, and cost optimization central to the value Coupa delivers. Viswanathan leads Coupa’s global supply chain strategy, shaping how the company positions and scales its solutions across the market. After years spent in supply chain planning technology, he now sits at the intersection of procurement, supply chain, and advanced analytics—an area he believes has never been more exciting or more critical.   Old Problems, New Pressures—and a Greater Willingness to Innovate When asked about the biggest challenges facing planners today, Viswanathan emphasized a…
circular economy
Blogs
April 3, 2026

Are You Sure Consumers Are the Unlock for Circularity?

written by Deborah Dull, on site at GreenBiz 2026   One of the most repeated excuses in the circular economy space is that American consumers just do not care enough. They will not sort their waste. They will not pay a premium for sustainable products. They will not participate in take-back programs. Europe is different, the story goes. Americans are a lost cause. Today I sat through a panel where that story got taken apart, piece by piece, with actual data. On this panel were Tom Szaky the CEO at TerraCycle and Loop, Gary Lewis the CEO at Resourcify, Rob Whitter the Head of Climate and Sustainability at Visa, and Casper Venbjerg Hansen the Senior Director of Sustainability Risk & Compliance for Ambu A/S; all facilitated by Lauren Phipps of MOLG. A company that runs in-store recycling programs across more than a million locations in 20 countries looked at their numbers. Whether someone was bringing back a wetsuit in Japan, cosmetics in France, or gear in the United States, the behavior was statistically identical. You could not tell the countries apart. American consumers who chose to participate were participating at the exact same rate as everyone else. Then there was…