Share:

Coupa’s Nari Viswanathan on Autonomous Spend, AI Accessibility, and the Future of Planning

At the Gartner Supply Chain Planning Summit in Denver, Scott Luton sat down with Nari Viswanathan, a veteran innovator in the planning and procurement technology space and a key leader at Coupa. The two reconnected after several recent collaborations—including webinars, industry sessions, and conversations in Dallas—and discussed the new realities of supply chain planning and how organizations are embracing technology like never before.

 

Coupa and Autonomous Spend Management

For those less familiar with Coupa, Viswanathan explained the company as the global leader in autonomous spend management—a framework that brings together direct and indirect spending to help organizations manage total spend more intelligently. Direct spend, of course, is where supply chain operations come into focus, making planning, design, and cost optimization central to the value Coupa delivers.

Viswanathan leads Coupa’s global supply chain strategy, shaping how the company positions and scales its solutions across the market. After years spent in supply chain planning technology, he now sits at the intersection of procurement, supply chain, and advanced analytics—an area he believes has never been more exciting or more critical.

 

Old Problems, New Pressures—and a Greater Willingness to Innovate

When asked about the biggest challenges facing planners today, Viswanathan emphasized a familiar set of themes: complexity, volatility, disruptions, and data overload. These challenges have not gone away. In fact, they’ve intensified.

What has changed, however, is people’s willingness to adopt new technology.

The reason? AI has landed in everyday life. Tools like ChatGPT and Gemini have made AI tangible and accessible, even to non-technical users. As a result, Viswanathan is seeing more openness—especially in planning organizations—to experiment, test, and implement new capabilities.

 

AI Must Start With Real Use Cases

Referencing insights shared by Noha Samara in a session earlier that day, Scott noted a case study where a company grounded its AI strategy in the end users’ specific business needs. Viswanathan wholeheartedly agreed: AI only works when tied directly to a use case.

Coupa itself has been using AI for more than a decade, long before AI was a market buzzword. One example: when a buyer adds an item to a shopping cart, Coupa can instantly show how similar customers purchased that item, at what price, and whether the decision aligns with best practices. This real-time, comparative intelligence is only possible because Coupa aggregates large volumes of anonymized spend data across thousands of customers.

 

Scenario Planning at Speed: A Real-World Example

Viswanathan also pointed to more strategic applications. In his upcoming conference session, he would highlight GAF, a major building materials manufacturer using Coupa’s planning and optimization tools to run rapid-fire scenarios.

In a sector affected by interest rate shifts, macroeconomic changes, and even storm-related demand spikes, GAF uses AI-driven models to understand impacts quickly and develop confident responses. Speed and insight, Viswanathan emphasized, are critical advantages.

 

Connecting With Nari

For leaders looking to learn more, Viswanathan recommends connecting with him on LinkedIn, as well as visit Coupa’s website. We invite you to check out one of Nari’s past webinars on Supply Chain Now, including this one from 2025 entitled “Adapting to Volatility: Navigating Trade Wars, Supply Chain Disruptions & AI”.

Take a listen to the full audio version of this interview with Scott W. Luton and Nari Viswanathan: click here.

More Blogs

AI
Blogs
July 31, 2025

5 questions I frequently get asked about automating operations with AI

Special Guest Blog Post written by Parabola Founder & CEO, Alex Yaseen   Operators are under pressure. They’re expected to move faster, do more with less, and somehow keep everything running smoothly while their systems, tools, and data are a mess. Now, AI is adding a whole new layer. On one hand, it’s exciting. The potential is real. On the other, a lot of teams feel stuck. They know they should be using AI, but they’re not sure where it fits into their day-to-day work. These are the five questions I get asked most often—whether someone’s trying to get started with automation, or trying to figure out how AI actually helps. 1. Can we automate this, or is it too messy? This question usually comes from someone deep in a spreadsheet that was never meant to scale. The short answer is: yes, you can probably automate it. But the longer answer is that you’ll need to rethink the process first. AI can help summarize, transform, and clean data—but it won’t fix a broken workflow. That’s on you. The best teams pair structured automation with lightweight AI to get leverage. Think: using rules and logic to standardize a workflow, and AI…
warranty management optimization
Blogs
May 5, 2026

Can the Warranty Claims Process be Improved?

written by Chris Cunnane with InterSystems   Automotive manufacturers have invested billions in digital transformation over the past two decades, achieving meaningful gains in production efficiency. Yet one area has stubbornly lagged behind: warranty cost performance. Despite advances aligned with Industry 4.0, warranty costs as a percentage of revenue have remained largely unchanged. This disconnect highlights a critical truth that while production has evolved, warranty operations have not kept pace. At the heart of the issue is a fundamental inefficiency: time. Specifically, the lag between when a warranty claim is submitted and when meaningful problem-solving begins. This delay not only drives up operational costs but also impacts customer satisfaction and brand perception.   The Hidden Complexity of Warranty Claims Warranty management is more than a back-office function. It is a complex, data-driven process involving multiple stakeholders, systems, and validation steps. Each claim requires verification of warranty coverage, assessment of the issue, and coordination across service providers, suppliers, and internal teams. Much of this process remains manual. Organizations often rely on fragmented systems, inconsistent data formats, and time-intensive validation steps such as reviewing receipts, maintenance records, and warranty agreements. These inefficiencies introduce delays that can stretch into weeks before root cause…