Share:

Why Your Supply Chain Team Spends More Time in Outlook Than Your ERP

written by Nick Gospodinov, Founder & CEO of Mandel AI

 

There is a dirty secret in supply chain management: the most critical information about your orders, delays, and supplier commitments doesn’t live in your ERP. It lives in email.

Not in dashboards. Not in control towers. In inboxes. Ask any procurement manager what they do first thing in the morning, and the answer is almost always the same: open Outlook, start scrolling. A supplier confirmed a ship date in a reply chain. A freight forwarder flagged a delay in an attachment. A pricing update came through as a PDF buried in a thread from two weeks ago. This is the real operating system of supply chain, and it has no search, no alerts, no reconciliation, and no memory.

 

The Coordination Gap No One Talks About

The supply chain technology market has poured billions into planning, visibility, and execution systems. These tools work when the data is clean, structured, and already inside the system. The problem is that the most operationally critical information never makes it there in time.

Manufacturers and distributors manage hundreds, sometimes thousands, of supplier relationships. Each one generates a constant stream of unstructured communication: order confirmations, shipping notices, change orders, quality reports, invoices, and RFQ responses. These arrive as emails, PDFs, spreadsheets, and sometimes just a line of text in a reply.

The result is a coordination gap. Your ERP says one thing. Your supplier’s email says another. And nobody notices until the line goes down, the shipment is late, or the invoice doesn’t match the PO. This is not a planning problem. It is not a visibility problem. It is a coordination problem, and until now, solving it meant hiring more people to read more emails.

 

The $1.6 Trillion Blind Spot

Industry research estimates that undetected supply chain disruptions cost global manufacturers over $1.6 trillion annually. Not because companies lack ERPs or visibility platforms, but because the signals that predict disruptions (a delayed confirmation, a changed lead time, a backorder notice buried in a PDF) arrive in formats and channels that no enterprise system is designed to read.

We saw this firsthand. A medical device manufacturer nearly missed a critical production deadline because a backorder notification sat unread in a procurement inbox for three days. A European pharmaceutical company discovered a €60,000 pricing discrepancy only after our system automatically reconciled a supplier’s invoice against the original purchase order. These are not edge cases. They are Tuesday.

 

What Coordination Intelligence Actually Looks Like

At Mandel, we built a coordination layer that sits on top of the tools supply chain teams already use: email, ERP, and document management systems. Instead of asking teams to change how they work, we meet them where the work actually happens.

The system reads every inbound supplier communication, extracts structured data from unstructured messages, cross-references it against existing purchase orders, contracts, and schedules, and surfaces exceptions in real time. When a supplier confirms a date that conflicts with a PO, the team knows immediately. When a price changes between quote and invoice, the discrepancy is flagged before payment. This is not another dashboard to check. It is a coordination layer that turns email into actionable, reconciled supply chain data.

 

Why Now?

Geopolitical volatility (tariffs, trade wars, reshoring) is forcing manufacturers to onboard new suppliers faster than ever. Every new supplier relationship means more unstructured communication, more documents, more coordination risk. At the same time, the technology to reliably read, interpret, and act on messy, unstructured data has finally caught up to the problem.

The companies that figure out coordination first will not just avoid disruptions. They will move faster, negotiate better, and build supplier relationships that compound over time.

 

The Inbox Is the Last Mile of Supply Chain

The industry has spent decades digitizing planning, warehousing, transportation, and execution. The last undigitized mile is coordination: the human-to-human communication layer that holds everything together. That is the layer we are building at Mandel AI. Your supply chain already has the data. It is just trapped in the wrong place.

 

Nick Gospodinov is the Founder and CEO of Mandel AI. He studied Electrical Engineering at King’s College London before co-founding a payments startup and working as an engineer at Kraken. A conversation with an F500 executive about how global supply chains were still run on email and spreadsheets sparked the idea for Mandel in 2024.

More Blogs

sourcing strategy
Blogs
June 26, 2026

AI Is Good at Picking Qualified Suppliers. It Still Struggles to Pick the Best One.

Companies are rapidly integrating generative AI into procurement and sourcing decisions. The promise is obvious. AI can read thousands of pages of supplier proposals faster than any human team, summarize technical requirements in seconds, and create the appearance of consistency and objectivity in evaluation. But there is an important distinction managers are starting to overlook. The same AI system that performs extremely well at identifying whether a supplier meets minimum requirements may perform much less reliably when judging which supplier is truly better. Recent research published in the Journal of Business Logistics examined this issue by comparing how large language models evaluated supplier bids against evaluations completed by experienced procurement professionals. It analyzed 123 supplier proposals tied to 31 public procurement projects conducted by the State of Ohio between 2023 and 2024. The projects involved complex IT services contracts, many containing large, text-heavy bid packages requiring evaluative judgment rather than simple arithmetic comparisons. The researchers tested three reasoning-oriented AI models: OpenAI o3, Grok-3-Mini, and DeepSeek R1. They then compared their evaluations against human procurement scores. The findings revealed a surprisingly clear pattern. AI performed well when evaluating compliance signals. These are signals tied to baseline qualifications and technical requirements. Does…
data
Blogs
December 17, 2025

SAP’s David Vallejo on the New Era of Planning: From Algorithms to Data-Driven Confidence

In a rapidly evolving global supply chain landscape, SAP’s David Vallejo believes the most exciting innovations are happening in planning—and that the industry is entering a fundamentally new era. At the Gartner Supply Chain Planning Summit 2025 in Denver, Vallejo, who leads global product marketing for SAP’s supply chain portfolio, joined Scott Luton to discuss how planning is transforming, why data now sits at the center of competitiveness, and what SAP is doing to help organizations make faster, more confident decisions.   A Shift From ERP-Centric to Data-Centric Vallejo described his team’s role as one that constantly scans the market—identifying trends, customer expectations, and the problems companies will need to solve next. Those insights help shape new innovations across the SAP ecosystem. He noted that SAP has moved decisively from an ERP-centric worldview to a data-centric one. This shift is essential, he argued, because the biggest advantage in modern planning lies in having the right data—clean, connected, contextualized, and ready to drive decisions. As Vallejo put it, “It’s all about the data that I need to make better planning decisions.”   Planning Models Are No Longer Static Reflecting on how planning has evolved since he entered the field two decades…