Share:

Why Your Supply Chain Team Spends More Time in Outlook Than Your ERP

written by Nick Gospodinov, Founder & CEO of Mandel AI

 

There is a dirty secret in supply chain management: the most critical information about your orders, delays, and supplier commitments doesn’t live in your ERP. It lives in email.

Not in dashboards. Not in control towers. In inboxes. Ask any procurement manager what they do first thing in the morning, and the answer is almost always the same: open Outlook, start scrolling. A supplier confirmed a ship date in a reply chain. A freight forwarder flagged a delay in an attachment. A pricing update came through as a PDF buried in a thread from two weeks ago. This is the real operating system of supply chain, and it has no search, no alerts, no reconciliation, and no memory.

 

The Coordination Gap No One Talks About

The supply chain technology market has poured billions into planning, visibility, and execution systems. These tools work when the data is clean, structured, and already inside the system. The problem is that the most operationally critical information never makes it there in time.

Manufacturers and distributors manage hundreds, sometimes thousands, of supplier relationships. Each one generates a constant stream of unstructured communication: order confirmations, shipping notices, change orders, quality reports, invoices, and RFQ responses. These arrive as emails, PDFs, spreadsheets, and sometimes just a line of text in a reply.

The result is a coordination gap. Your ERP says one thing. Your supplier’s email says another. And nobody notices until the line goes down, the shipment is late, or the invoice doesn’t match the PO. This is not a planning problem. It is not a visibility problem. It is a coordination problem, and until now, solving it meant hiring more people to read more emails.

 

The $1.6 Trillion Blind Spot

Industry research estimates that undetected supply chain disruptions cost global manufacturers over $1.6 trillion annually. Not because companies lack ERPs or visibility platforms, but because the signals that predict disruptions (a delayed confirmation, a changed lead time, a backorder notice buried in a PDF) arrive in formats and channels that no enterprise system is designed to read.

We saw this firsthand. A medical device manufacturer nearly missed a critical production deadline because a backorder notification sat unread in a procurement inbox for three days. A European pharmaceutical company discovered a €60,000 pricing discrepancy only after our system automatically reconciled a supplier’s invoice against the original purchase order. These are not edge cases. They are Tuesday.

 

What Coordination Intelligence Actually Looks Like

At Mandel, we built a coordination layer that sits on top of the tools supply chain teams already use: email, ERP, and document management systems. Instead of asking teams to change how they work, we meet them where the work actually happens.

The system reads every inbound supplier communication, extracts structured data from unstructured messages, cross-references it against existing purchase orders, contracts, and schedules, and surfaces exceptions in real time. When a supplier confirms a date that conflicts with a PO, the team knows immediately. When a price changes between quote and invoice, the discrepancy is flagged before payment. This is not another dashboard to check. It is a coordination layer that turns email into actionable, reconciled supply chain data.

 

Why Now?

Geopolitical volatility (tariffs, trade wars, reshoring) is forcing manufacturers to onboard new suppliers faster than ever. Every new supplier relationship means more unstructured communication, more documents, more coordination risk. At the same time, the technology to reliably read, interpret, and act on messy, unstructured data has finally caught up to the problem.

The companies that figure out coordination first will not just avoid disruptions. They will move faster, negotiate better, and build supplier relationships that compound over time.

 

The Inbox Is the Last Mile of Supply Chain

The industry has spent decades digitizing planning, warehousing, transportation, and execution. The last undigitized mile is coordination: the human-to-human communication layer that holds everything together. That is the layer we are building at Mandel AI. Your supply chain already has the data. It is just trapped in the wrong place.

 

Nick Gospodinov is the Founder and CEO of Mandel AI. He studied Electrical Engineering at King’s College London before co-founding a payments startup and working as an engineer at Kraken. A conversation with an F500 executive about how global supply chains were still run on email and spreadsheets sparked the idea for Mandel in 2024.

More Blogs

foundational industries investment
Blogs
February 23, 2026

Investing at the Seams: Rachel Holt of Construct Capital on AI, Visibility, and the Race to Transform Foundational Industries

From Uber to Foundational Industries At Manifest 2026, Scott Luton sat down with Rachel Holt, Co-Founder and Managing Partner of Construct Capital, to explore how venture capital is fueling the next era of supply chain innovation. Construct Capital, now six years old, was founded in early 2020 with a bold thesis: transform foundational industries that represent nearly half of GDP: supply chain, logistics, manufacturing, mobility, infrastructure, and defense. When the fund launched, Holt recalls many skeptics asking whether supply chain and logistics were truly venture-scale opportunities. It echoed what she heard when she joined Uber in 2011, when transportation was considered slow moving and heavily regulated. Yet Uber went on to redefine personal logistics. Her final years at Uber brought a pivotal lesson. While the rides business operated with second-by-second visibility, the company’s e-bike and scooter supply chain operated in near darkness. Products shipped from China would disappear for weeks at sea, briefly reappear at ports, then stall again in customs. “We had no visibility, we had no ability to reroute,” Holt shared, as this Eureka moment would go on to help shape her investment focus.   The Visibility Gap at the Seams Supply chain, Holt emphasized, is not monolithic.…
Blogs
April 17, 2025

Navigating Hidden Freight Costs: Taking Control of Unexpected Charges

Blog Post written by Ohad Azgad, CEO of Cinch Logistics leaders must control costs while maintaining service quality, but hidden freight charges often erode profits due to poor visibility. Cinch analyzed over 7,000 line-item charges from 30+ freight forwarders, brokers, and carriers in FMCG and manufacturing, uncovering three major cost drivers: The Frequency-Impact Paradox Frequent charges like fuel surcharges appear in 14.4% of invoices but contribute just 4.2% of hidden costs. In contrast, customs duties—though present in only 5.8% of invoices—account for 52% of hidden costs. Identifying these patterns helps logistics teams focus on impactful cost reductions. Inconsistent Invoice Terminology Charge names like “Fuel Surcharge” vs. “Bunker Adjustment Factor” vary between carriers, reducing cost visibility and negotiation leverage. Standardizing terminology improves tracking, clarity, and vendor negotiations. Hidden Budget Risks: Customs, Duties & On-Carriage Fees Customs duties account for 46% of hidden costs, while on-carriage fees add 26%, despite appearing in only 4.3% of invoices. These charges are often underestimated during quoting, leading to budget overruns. Proactive management prevents unexpected expenses.   Strategies to Optimize Freight Costs Real-Time Data Analytics: Platforms like Cinch provide charge visibility during quoting, improving cost forecasting and negotiation leverage. Standardized Terminology: Consistent charge names enhance cost…