Share:

Why Your Supply Chain Team Spends More Time in Outlook Than Your ERP

written by Nick Gospodinov, Founder & CEO of Mandel AI

 

There is a dirty secret in supply chain management: the most critical information about your orders, delays, and supplier commitments doesn’t live in your ERP. It lives in email.

Not in dashboards. Not in control towers. In inboxes. Ask any procurement manager what they do first thing in the morning, and the answer is almost always the same: open Outlook, start scrolling. A supplier confirmed a ship date in a reply chain. A freight forwarder flagged a delay in an attachment. A pricing update came through as a PDF buried in a thread from two weeks ago. This is the real operating system of supply chain, and it has no search, no alerts, no reconciliation, and no memory.

 

The Coordination Gap No One Talks About

The supply chain technology market has poured billions into planning, visibility, and execution systems. These tools work when the data is clean, structured, and already inside the system. The problem is that the most operationally critical information never makes it there in time.

Manufacturers and distributors manage hundreds, sometimes thousands, of supplier relationships. Each one generates a constant stream of unstructured communication: order confirmations, shipping notices, change orders, quality reports, invoices, and RFQ responses. These arrive as emails, PDFs, spreadsheets, and sometimes just a line of text in a reply.

The result is a coordination gap. Your ERP says one thing. Your supplier’s email says another. And nobody notices until the line goes down, the shipment is late, or the invoice doesn’t match the PO. This is not a planning problem. It is not a visibility problem. It is a coordination problem, and until now, solving it meant hiring more people to read more emails.

 

The $1.6 Trillion Blind Spot

Industry research estimates that undetected supply chain disruptions cost global manufacturers over $1.6 trillion annually. Not because companies lack ERPs or visibility platforms, but because the signals that predict disruptions (a delayed confirmation, a changed lead time, a backorder notice buried in a PDF) arrive in formats and channels that no enterprise system is designed to read.

We saw this firsthand. A medical device manufacturer nearly missed a critical production deadline because a backorder notification sat unread in a procurement inbox for three days. A European pharmaceutical company discovered a €60,000 pricing discrepancy only after our system automatically reconciled a supplier’s invoice against the original purchase order. These are not edge cases. They are Tuesday.

 

What Coordination Intelligence Actually Looks Like

At Mandel, we built a coordination layer that sits on top of the tools supply chain teams already use: email, ERP, and document management systems. Instead of asking teams to change how they work, we meet them where the work actually happens.

The system reads every inbound supplier communication, extracts structured data from unstructured messages, cross-references it against existing purchase orders, contracts, and schedules, and surfaces exceptions in real time. When a supplier confirms a date that conflicts with a PO, the team knows immediately. When a price changes between quote and invoice, the discrepancy is flagged before payment. This is not another dashboard to check. It is a coordination layer that turns email into actionable, reconciled supply chain data.

 

Why Now?

Geopolitical volatility (tariffs, trade wars, reshoring) is forcing manufacturers to onboard new suppliers faster than ever. Every new supplier relationship means more unstructured communication, more documents, more coordination risk. At the same time, the technology to reliably read, interpret, and act on messy, unstructured data has finally caught up to the problem.

The companies that figure out coordination first will not just avoid disruptions. They will move faster, negotiate better, and build supplier relationships that compound over time.

 

The Inbox Is the Last Mile of Supply Chain

The industry has spent decades digitizing planning, warehousing, transportation, and execution. The last undigitized mile is coordination: the human-to-human communication layer that holds everything together. That is the layer we are building at Mandel AI. Your supply chain already has the data. It is just trapped in the wrong place.

 

Nick Gospodinov is the Founder and CEO of Mandel AI. He studied Electrical Engineering at King’s College London before co-founding a payments startup and working as an engineer at Kraken. A conversation with an F500 executive about how global supply chains were still run on email and spreadsheets sparked the idea for Mandel in 2024.

More Blogs

supply chain planning
Blogs
January 16, 2026

Demand Chain AI’s Rob Haddock on Raising Planning Maturity and Helping Companies Outgrow Spreadsheets

At the Gartner Supply Chain Planning Summit in Denver, Scott Luton caught up with Rob Haddock, a seasoned supply chain practitioner and advisor with Demand Chain AI, to discuss the persistent planning challenges organizations face—and why maturity, discipline, and optimization still matter more than buzzwords. Demand Chain AI blends consulting services with advanced supply chain technologies, focusing on optimization across trade promotion management, demand sensing, supply planning, and detailed production scheduling. Haddock’s role centers on helping organizations strengthen business processes—particularly sales and operations planning (S&OP), performance reporting, and the practical application of technology to improve execution on both the demand and supply sides.   A Practitioner’s Perspective on Planning Gaps Haddock’s perspective is shaped by decades spent inside large, sophisticated supply chain organizations. Early in his career, he worked within an iconic, global beverage company where advanced planning environments were already in place—though, in hindsight, he admits those tools were sometimes underutilized. Today, Haddock spends much of his time working with small and mid-sized organizations that haven’t been as fortunate. In many of these environments, planning maturity is still low, foundational practices are missing, and—unsurprisingly—Excel remains the primary planning tool. “Basic business practices that have been around since the 1990s…
ESG performance
Blogs
June 11, 2026

The Sustainability Voice Missing From Most Boardrooms

Companies spend enormous amounts of time debating sustainability strategy. They invest in emissions reduction. They launch environmental initiatives. They publish ESG reports. They set ambitious goals. Yet many overlook a simpler question: Who is helping shape those decisions in the boardroom? Recent research published in the Journal of Business Logistics suggests that board composition may influence environmental performance in ways that executives do not fully appreciate. The study examined more than 2,000 firm year observations across 306 publicly traded business-to-business companies. The researchers explored whether having a customer or supplier represented on the board of directors affected a firm’s environmental performance. The answer was yes. But not in the way many executives might expect. Most discussions about board diversity focus on demographics, functional expertise, or independence. This research points to another form of diversity that may be equally important: where directors sit within the supply chain. A customer and a supplier can look at the same sustainability decision and see very different priorities. Those priorities often shape the choices firms ultimately make. The researchers found that companies with customer affiliated directors generally achieved stronger environmental performance. Customer representatives appeared to bring market knowledge and external stakeholder expectations into board discussions.…