Share:

The Geopolitics of Junk

written by Deborah Dull, on site at GreenBiz 2026

 

I spent today in a room full of people who think about waste for a living. And the word that kept coming up had nothing to do with recycling. It was sovereignty.

Here is the situation. The United States imports 95% of its critical mineral supply. Lithium, cobalt, rare earth elements, the stuff inside every battery, every semiconductor, every electric motor. We do not make it, we do not mine much of it, and we do not control the supply chain that delivers it. That is not an energy policy problem. That is a national security problem.

Now here is the part that should make you put down your coffee. A ton of smartphones contains dramatically more gold than a ton of mined ore. We are talking about concentrations that make urban mining look like a gold rush compared to digging in the ground. And yet the recovery rate for those materials, once a phone leaves its first owner, drops to around 13%. We are losing roughly 80% of the value sitting in devices right now, in drawers, in closets, in landfills.

E-waste is also the fastest growing waste stream in the world, at 2% per year. We are not catching up. We are falling further behind every single year we delay building the systems to recover these materials.

What I kept hearing today, from people running battery recycling operations, from state economic development officers, from supply chain professionals, is a reframe that matters. Urban mining is not a recycling program. It is a domestic supply chain strategy. The materials are already refined. They are already concentrated. They already exist inside products we made and sold. The only part missing is the infrastructure to get them back and the policy environment that makes it worth doing.

There are some promising signals. The federal government put $100 million toward critical mineral recovery through Project Vault. A critical mineral ministerial just launched. States like New Mexico are directing sovereign wealth fund capital toward exactly this kind of industry. The appetite is real.

But appetite without direction goes to the people who already have the relationships. That is not cynicism, that is just how procurement works. The question for everyone working in this space right now is whether we can get specific enough, fast enough, to shape where that money actually goes.

The materials are not buried in a mountain somewhere waiting on a 20-year permitting process. They are in your junk drawer. They are in the back of your office supply closet. They are in the decommissioned equipment sitting in a warehouse three miles from here.

We just need to stop treating them like trash and start treating them like inventory.

More Blogs

parcel management software
Blogs
April 28, 2026

Parcel Management Software + TMS: The Shortcut to Lower Costs and Better Performance

This post is written by our friends at e2open. E2open is the connected supply chain software platform that enables the world’s largest companies to transform the way they make, move, and sell goods and services. Moving as one.™ Learn More: www.e2open.com.   Parcel used to be the lightweight cousin of freight: important, but not something that kept supply chain leaders up at night. Those days are long gone. Today, parcel volumes rival truckload execution in complexity, visibility requirements, and cost impact. For many enterprises, parcel management software now determines whether omnichannel promises are kept—or quietly broken—one late delivery at a time. The problem isn’t parcel itself, but where it lives. When parcel operates in a separate system from your transportation management system (TMS), costs creep up, execution gets messy, and performance suffers. Integrating parcel directly into TMS workflows turns shipping from a necessary evil into a strategic advantage.   Parcel management: from warehouse detail to board-level problem Parcel complexity exploded as e-commerce, ship-from-store, and direct-to-consumer models took center stage. More carriers, more service levels, more delivery promises—and far more returns—turned parcel shipping into a daily operational chess match. That complexity has consequences. Parcel spend now shows up on executive radar.…
supply chain decision making
Blogs
February 16, 2026

2026 Is the Year of No Excuses: Why Calmer Conditions Could Expose (and Reward) True Commercial Leadership

A Shift in the Narrative for 2026 In a recent conversation, Scott Luton spoke with Mark Gilham, Vice President & Head of Global Advisory at Enable, about what supply chain and commercial leaders should expect from the year ahead. While many annual outlooks attempt to forecast the next major disruption, Gilham offered a different lens: 2026 may become the “year of no excuses.” After years defined by a global pandemic, inflationary shocks, geopolitical instability, supply shortages, and the rapid rise of AI, organizations have already endured extraordinary volatility. Businesses not only survived, but in many cases adapted and grew. According to Gilham, that reality weakens the argument that disruption alone explains underperformance. Disruption is not disappearing, he cautioned, but leaders can only lean on it for so long.   Why a Calmer Year Raises the Bar Gilham argued that if external conditions stabilize even slightly, the pressure on leadership actually increases. A less chaotic environment removes convenient explanations and shines a brighter light on internal shortcomings. Process gaps, misaligned incentives, and execution failures become harder to ignore when the world is not on fire. Rather than waiting for certainty, Gilham believes leaders should act decisively. This does not mean radical…