Share:

The Geopolitics of Junk

written by Deborah Dull, on site at GreenBiz 2026

 

I spent today in a room full of people who think about waste for a living. And the word that kept coming up had nothing to do with recycling. It was sovereignty.

Here is the situation. The United States imports 95% of its critical mineral supply. Lithium, cobalt, rare earth elements, the stuff inside every battery, every semiconductor, every electric motor. We do not make it, we do not mine much of it, and we do not control the supply chain that delivers it. That is not an energy policy problem. That is a national security problem.

Now here is the part that should make you put down your coffee. A ton of smartphones contains dramatically more gold than a ton of mined ore. We are talking about concentrations that make urban mining look like a gold rush compared to digging in the ground. And yet the recovery rate for those materials, once a phone leaves its first owner, drops to around 13%. We are losing roughly 80% of the value sitting in devices right now, in drawers, in closets, in landfills.

E-waste is also the fastest growing waste stream in the world, at 2% per year. We are not catching up. We are falling further behind every single year we delay building the systems to recover these materials.

What I kept hearing today, from people running battery recycling operations, from state economic development officers, from supply chain professionals, is a reframe that matters. Urban mining is not a recycling program. It is a domestic supply chain strategy. The materials are already refined. They are already concentrated. They already exist inside products we made and sold. The only part missing is the infrastructure to get them back and the policy environment that makes it worth doing.

There are some promising signals. The federal government put $100 million toward critical mineral recovery through Project Vault. A critical mineral ministerial just launched. States like New Mexico are directing sovereign wealth fund capital toward exactly this kind of industry. The appetite is real.

But appetite without direction goes to the people who already have the relationships. That is not cynicism, that is just how procurement works. The question for everyone working in this space right now is whether we can get specific enough, fast enough, to shape where that money actually goes.

The materials are not buried in a mountain somewhere waiting on a 20-year permitting process. They are in your junk drawer. They are in the back of your office supply closet. They are in the decommissioned equipment sitting in a warehouse three miles from here.

We just need to stop treating them like trash and start treating them like inventory.

More Blogs

automation
Blogs
April 27, 2026

Chaos, Capacity, and the Case for Automation: Pete Blair with Pickle Robot

At MODEX 2026 in Atlanta, the energy was unmistakable. With thousands of supply chain professionals gathered, one theme echoed across conversations: uncertainty is no longer episodic. It’s constant and seemingly endless. In a candid discussion with Scott Luton, Pete Blair, VP of Product & Marketing at Pickle Robot, unpacked how organizations are navigating volatility, workforce challenges, and the growing role of automation in keeping operations moving.   Navigating Tariffs and a Moving Target If there’s one word defining today’s global supply chain environment, it’s unpredictability. Blair points to tariffs as a prime example; and not just their presence, but their volatility. “The biggest thing we see… is the chaos of tariffs. It’s not so much that customers have to pay tariffs or not pay tariffs, it’s that they don’t know how to plan,” Blair explains. That lack of predictability is forcing organizations to rethink their networks in real time. Companies are shifting sourcing strategies, standing up temporary distribution centers in new geographies, and even making drastic decisions about whether importing goods makes financial sense at all. What’s particularly challenging isn’t the cost itself. But rather, it’s the inability to forecast. Supply chains, while resilient, aren’t designed for abrupt swings like…
business logistics
Blogs
June 26, 2026

AI Is Good at Picking Qualified Suppliers. It Still Struggles to Pick the Best One.

Companies are rapidly integrating generative AI into procurement and sourcing decisions. The promise is obvious. AI can read thousands of pages of supplier proposals faster than any human team, summarize technical requirements in seconds, and create the appearance of consistency and objectivity in evaluation. But there is an important distinction managers are starting to overlook. The same AI system that performs extremely well at identifying whether a supplier meets minimum requirements may perform much less reliably when judging which supplier is truly better. Recent research published in the Journal of Business Logistics examined this issue by comparing how large language models evaluated supplier bids against evaluations completed by experienced procurement professionals. It analyzed 123 supplier proposals tied to 31 public procurement projects conducted by the State of Ohio between 2023 and 2024. The projects involved complex IT services contracts, many containing large, text-heavy bid packages requiring evaluative judgment rather than simple arithmetic comparisons. The researchers tested three reasoning-oriented AI models: OpenAI o3, Grok-3-Mini, and DeepSeek R1. They then compared their evaluations against human procurement scores. The findings revealed a surprisingly clear pattern. AI performed well when evaluating compliance signals. These are signals tied to baseline qualifications and technical requirements. Does…